somanytta

4 ms·

1.
by somanytta 3y ago
The law is clearly not preventing vendors from selling X, its preventing them dumping it if they can't sell it. Not sure how people can't see this difference. Preventing companies dumping or disposing of their (harmful) waste (in
2.
by somanytta 3y ago
> How would you concretely ban such a thing? Uhmmm, so your answer is to have to some group of people asses every item of clothing or every new brand that pops up to see if it qualifies as fast-fashion based on whether it was influenced
3.
by somanytta 3y ago
Consider that, I want to be able to use a regular android OS, but I don't completely trust it, either its purposely malicious or just accidently going to leak info. So isolation is good in this case, its much easier to audit the mechan
4.
by somanytta 3y ago
> Confidential computing is cool and useful when you’re the one controlling the VM, but scary when you’re the one blindly running it on your hardware Important point. > Hopefully this gets (publicly!) backdoored like SEV, SGX, etc Fro
5.
by somanytta 3y ago
It's not really a matter of need, more a matter of good hygiene. Do you trust any modern OS not to accidently include sensitive information when it generates a crash report for an app and sends it off the some remote server in the back
6.
by somanytta 3y ago
Don't understand this, why would telcos fight against LE to provide access? Seems like the path of least resistance for them to go along with government requests, rather than something more nefarious. Sibling post imagines an explicit