solyaris

6 ms·

1.
by solyaris 6y ago
very interesting! I would like to know more about the voice assistant technology and the cobot logic.
2.
by solyaris 9y ago
exactly!
3.
by solyaris 9y ago
Even if I'm an happy Ruby developer, I feel that realizing a chatbot - in a specific programming language, - with a standard framework (Rails), - for a specific channel (Messenger), is an ERROR, in the log terms. BTW, I realized na
4.
by solyaris 9y ago
Even if I'm an happy Ruby developer, I feel that realizing a chatbot - in a standard programming language (Ruby), - with a standard framework (Rails), - for a specific channel (Messenger), is an ERROR, in the long terms. BTW, I realize
5.
by solyaris 9y ago
I agree!
6.
by solyaris 11y ago
Author here. To maintain persistence of your comments, please reply on stackexchange too (an vote there the question tehre maybe) Thanks for your attention giorgio
7.
by solyaris 11y ago
I highly suggest this Ruby gem to realize Telegram bots. Baed on Alexander's work, myself I realized a github project to show how to use webhooks integration: http://www.github.com/solyaris/BOTServer
8.
by solyaris 11y ago
BTW, a friend of mine suggest to me now: https://www.rivescript.com/ That's an AIML alternative that seems a bit better (no XML!), but I do not yet understood if I can do with rivescript a "simple" ecommerce
9.
by solyaris 11y ago
thank for your links! generally speaking, I can't agree with your first statement :) and I anticipated my ignorance in linguistic topics :) I'll investigate and study to understand about "pragmatic" and semantic understa
10.
by solyaris 11y ago
thanks a lot for your links! I maintain a sort of microblog just about these topics: http://www.twitter.com/solyarisoftware Me too I just discovered Chris Messina's definition of "conversational commerce", de
11.
by solyaris 11y ago
Hi Kleiba years ago I studied a bit AIML and also recently I see that Ruby language implementation is a bit obsolete. My feeling is that AIML are not maintained / growing, but the principal point I a bit discarderd AIML is that it seem
12.
by solyaris 11y ago
Hi all! author here. It make sense to implement chatbots dialogs where each dialog is implemented as a finite state machine ? Good idea or a naif-robotic approach ? BTW, please consider: 1: https://github.com/solyaris/di
13.
Show HN: A dialog system framework for conversational services?(github.com)
16 points by solyaris 11y ago|8 comments
14.
by solyaris 11y ago
Short answer: I'm sorry, I'm against the tech/business approach of this project. Notes: I'm an ambient electronic music maker (and software maker too). I saw a lot of similar projects since Brian Eno's generative mu
15.
by solyaris 11y ago
Author here, I'll be pleased to answer questions. BOTServer is a simple project in Ruby language to manage many Telegram bots with a server webhooks routing 'architecture' (instead of a proliferation of processes doing long p
16.
Show HN: BOTServer – Telegram Bot Webhooks Framework Server, for Rubyists(github.com)
4 points by solyaris 11y ago|1 comments
17.
by solyaris 11y ago
>this could be a viable option for push notification in the IoT domain. Yes! :)
18.
by solyaris 11y ago
>All the cool kids were talking about it, so I thought I might as well support them, too. I agree with Sam Saffron (thanks Sam for al your githubcode) about some perplexity using websockets as a panacea nowadays. Nevertheless, I really a
19.
by solyaris 11y ago
great project! I retwitted: https://twitter.com/solyarisoftware/status/67379850204928000... Documentation is VERY well done. publisher: Curl examples are perfect. subscribers: maybe some examples in a language ( R
20.
by solyaris 11y ago
> Nope, the bot only stores track title, performer and id. Actual media is stored on Telegram servers. good idea ;-) BTW, do you have any recent news about Telegram decisions about uploaded files persistence on their server ? https:&#x
21.
by solyaris 11y ago
Yes, BTW, you know, there is a debate about the fact Facebook M if fake artificial intelligence, but instead M hidden a usual help-desk by humans. It doesn't matter... I believe in services exactly made by collaborations amongs bots a
22.
by solyaris 11y ago
Terms Of Services ? As far as I know, Telegram is really really open (at the moment) with really few limitations. For me, this is a very important fact. yes, is a big (and debated) topic; Pavel Durov express many times the point. See: http
23.
by solyaris 11y ago
BTW, regarding file persistence rules on telegram Servers,I share Telegram Bot API link: https://core.telegram.org/bots/faq#can-i-count-on-file-ids-t...
24.
by solyaris 11y ago
Yes, Stephan, possible long debates about the overall scenario of peer-to-peer music sharing. We have experience about what happens in past. Big majors won (until now). Now as I said in my previous comment, I'm me too an indipendent &q
25.
by solyaris 11y ago
Hi Stepan! I Love your project. I appreciate: 1 your code/architecture approach (I de in Ruby) 2. MusicBot as application example as a possibly "disruptive" Telegram bot! Not the usual game-bot. BTW, I'm an "indipe
26.
by solyaris 11y ago
author here, I'll be pleased to answer questions. feel free to share notes/feedbacks/criticisms! giorgio