soheil

23 ms·

271.
by soheil 4y ago
Literally there is no greater cost than not being able to live/earn a living/achieve any of your goals. So of course the cost is worth it.
272.
by soheil 4y ago
I do not recommend remote therapy one bit.
273.
by soheil 4y ago
So sorry I replied to the wrong thread. I left another comment on your here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34053767
274.
by soheil 4y ago
100% second that. Psychiatrists are real doctors with scientific, comprehensive, rigid education in STEM. Last thing you want is a pseudo PhD from Berkeley who majored in psychology and studied "human rights" as her thesis.
275.
by soheil 4y ago
I mean I don't know why people keep saying it's too late to have kids if you're 43. You could have a 20 year old by age 65, which is the time you could retire and have them move out after they get a job.
276.
by soheil 4y ago
It depends. If you're in a serious rut I seriously think a therapist could make it worse. You need the right fit who your brain is not going to dismiss the moment they open their mouth.
277.
by soheil 4y ago
Seeing a bad therapist is worse than not seeing a therapist. I'd avoid online directories that are known to be gamed. Seek referrals from real people in your area.
278.
by soheil 4y ago
Referral are probably best. Seek people in your area in that profession and just ask anyone if who'd they recommend. You need to fix your brain. Spending 50% of your income/spendings for at least one year on therapy is the minimum
279.
by soheil 4y ago
Please refrain from comments that could put people in danger. It is at best careless to say to someone with possible depression therapy may not be the answer.
280.
by soheil 4y ago
See a psychiatrist immediately. Everything else here is BS.
281.
by soheil 4y ago
Better believe it!!
282.
by soheil 4y ago
Glad to see Twitter is doing this. The reason Musk bought Twitter was to rid it of the type of behavior you frequently see on m6n. It's a direct competitor to Twitter. Twitter is a commercial product and needs to maintain its users and
283.
by soheil 4y ago
Flowers are not necessary either.
284.
by soheil 4y ago
Mesons should been called gluons, way stickier for sure.
285.
by soheil 4y ago
Anything that does syntax highlighting, jumps to definition and allows you to install additional packages/functionality is an IDE and everything else that you call an IDE is actually bloatware (see, I can do that too.) No, I don't
286.
by soheil 4y ago
I think the cycle repeats itself, there used to be bloat-wares like Eclipse (IntelliFuck) that programmers would swear by. Then came Sublime and people had a revelation about how light and fast an IDE can and should be. Recently there has b
287.
by soheil 4y ago
If you're returning who cares about the scope? Are you saying visually you'd like to have indentation inside the if body? If that's the case there is also nothing stopping you in most languages from doing something as nasty a
288.
by soheil 4y ago
Funny how human languages converge.
289.
by soheil 4y ago
It's not pointless, it makes code read better. It's another option to have. It's not meant for every use case. It indicates you don't understand Ruby if you find yourself using an "unless" in a complex boolean
290.
by soheil 4y ago
"Unless" should only be used when the imperative condition is simple. You don't understand Ruby if you think there is something wrong with trying to have more than one option to do things, imperfect shortcuts and more human-r
291.
by soheil 4y ago
As a journalist you ask tough questions and demands answers. Stop being a NYT apologist. Sorkin threw softballs at SBF again and again, accepted answers given without an iota of concern about the bold lies spewed back, profusely thanked SBF
292.
by soheil 4y ago
And of course there can't be a mind virus around the mind virus that he heavily donated to democrats on the part of idiot republicans and that only a free-minded savant on HN would know that he also donated to republicans.
293.
by soheil 4y ago
Except that only a moron would ask those questions in a vacuum like Sorkin did without a single follow up. He didn't challenge a single one of his answers when there is so much evidence against the lies he spewed. It's really not
294.
by soheil 4y ago
This is a cancer that is spreading through tech. I believe SOC2 compliance requires 2FA and the people who set those standards are probably closer to politicians than to software engineers. We don't need stupid banners asking if it&#x2
295.
by soheil 4y ago
Oh please, just watch the NYT interview with him. It takes the definition of a puff piece to new heights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyoGdwVIwWw
296.
by soheil 4y ago
A difference without a difference. A bus crash at 60MPH on a freeway can be just as deadly for everyone inside. There is a deadly bus crash with multiple fatalities almost once a month: https://www.google.com/search?q=bus+cr
297.
by soheil 4y ago
How does NYT feel about interviewing him literally not more than two weeks ago and trying to frame him as a super smart kid making a dumb mistake?
298.
by soheil 4y ago
Heh this thread is full of them https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33909017
299.
by soheil 4y ago
If anything this will lower the unjustified weight people give to articulate speech and prose instead of caring about content.
300.
by soheil 4y ago
Safety implications are total bs, the moment a plane that has one pilot goes down congress will pass a law than requires a minimum of 6 pilots for every plane. So that would be idiotic on the part of airlines to lobby for if they suspected

More ›