soerxpso

8 ms·

91.
by soerxpso 2y ago
> I want my people to keep their basic agreements and promises I didn't agree to send anything to Ukraine; there is no agreement to keep. Maybe we should just raise taxes on you people who voted for it and send your money if you&#
92.
by soerxpso 2y ago
That's literally what we're doing. Zelensky came to beg for more money, and we're shutting up. I don't really care if Europeans want to go die pointlessly on the frontlines for some reason.
93.
by soerxpso 2y ago
I can think of a hundred things we could have US defense contractors make instead. And it's surprising how quickly Democrats have begun worshiping the Military Industrial Complex. As recently as Bush, it was the boogeyman. Now I'm
94.
by soerxpso 2y ago
The claim you're making is ludicrous. We don't show strength by giving away all of our resources on pointless conflicts that don't involve us. Even if the USSR was as nice as you pretend, Ukraine was also part of the USSR, an
95.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Nobody in the US voted for that agreement. I want the world to notice that they need to stop treating my people like daddy's credit card. It's a shame that the previous occupying regime hated its constituents enough to make these
96.
by soerxpso 2y ago
In what way is it in my interest to give hundreds of billions of my nation's money toward fighting an unwinnable conflict on the other side of the world over which corrupt sex trafficking organization will control a small plot of land?
97.
by soerxpso 2y ago
The architecture was their choice. It's completely possible to build a PC with that form factor which does not have soldered RAM, so it's strange that they went with it. Their brand with laptops is supposed to be 'more repair
98.
by soerxpso 2y ago
It's reasonably easy to get that information from their SEC filings (for public companies), which are all in similar formats, if not exactly the same format. It wouldn't be as hard as you're implying.
99.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Out of touch? The people offended by this are not their target customers. I imagine there are far fewer managers sitting around thinking, "I need a way to identify my good workers so I can reward them" than managers thinking, &quo
100.
by soerxpso 2y ago
This certainly seems sound for whatever portion of the gulf is Mexico's territory, but, does Mexico have jurisdiction over the 'middle part'? My non-expert understanding is that the US owns the portion of the gulf that's
101.
by soerxpso 2y ago
What works then?
102.
by soerxpso 2y ago
> If your conclusion after reading a bunch of studies is "wow I really don't understand the fancy math they're doing here" then usually you should do the work to understand that math before you conclude that it's
103.
by soerxpso 2y ago
It's not the same language policing that got the left in trouble until you're worried about being fired from your job for calling it the Gulf of Mexico.
104.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Political editorials are not the reason anyone is coming to this site. I want to read about tech. Go to Reddit.
105.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Because to certain people, when a company lowers prices to compete because of an increase in supply, it's the competitive free market doing its things (not generosity), but when they increase prices because of a decrease in supply, it&
106.
by soerxpso 2y ago
I think it's largely a matter of routine. People have been buying the same eggs for years; switching is perceived as a risk by our monkey brains.
107.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Whether the first reasoning entity is an individual organism or a group of organisms is completely irrelevant to the original point. If one were to grant that there was in fact a "first reasoning group" rather than a "first r
108.
by soerxpso 2y ago
No, I didn't confuse the two. There is not a formal definition of "smart", but if you're claiming that factual accuracy is unrelated to it, I can't imagine that that's in good faith.
109.
by soerxpso 2y ago
What is the valid democratic process to use if the public doesn't like the unelected officers of the institutions of the executive branch? Is the claim being made that these people have a constitutional right to run the FBI, USAID, etc
110.
by soerxpso 2y ago
> If they just benefited from repurposing OpenAI data, that's different than having achieved an engineering breakthrough One way or another, they were able to create something that has WAY cheaper inference costs than o1 at the same
111.
by soerxpso 2y ago
The initial claim was that distillation can never be used to create a model B that's smarter than model A, because B only has access to A's knowledge. The argument you're responding to was that play and reflection can result
112.
by soerxpso 2y ago
There was necessarily a "first reasoning being" who learned reasoning from scratch, and then it's improved from there. Humans needed tens of thousands of years because: - humans experience reality at a slower pace than AI cou
113.
by soerxpso 2y ago
The goal with most of these AI features is not to solve a real problem users are having, it's to add a feature that uses AI. This will not change because it's not wrong of the individuals making the decision. The project manager g
114.
by soerxpso 2y ago
What's really annoying is how its idea of "polishing" is just making the email worse. Who could possibly benefit from the recipient needing to sift through more boilerplate to find the actual content of the email? 15 years ag
115.
by soerxpso 2y ago
"Deanonymization" doesn't have to refer to a full exact address. There are people who wish to conceal which country or region they live in, which this cripples. There was a real example of that amount of information being rel
116.
by soerxpso 2y ago
That still sounds like a pretty low opinion, even if it's more general than only applying to Americans. You're essentially saying that the outcome of an election is determined primarily by who owns the most effective propaganda ma
117.
by soerxpso 2y ago
If TikTok were sold to an American company, as the new law demands, why would that change anything about the amount of pro-Palestinian content? Just because the ADL said they don't like TikTok does not mean that's the motivation f
118.
by soerxpso 2y ago
This is not affecting US citizens' legal free speech rights. You have the right to say what you want; you don't have the right to say it on a specific platform. You had free speech without TikTok before it existed, and you'
119.
by soerxpso 2y ago
Why do people make the default assumption that "free speech" only refers to a specific American legal principle? Free speech existed long before the Constitution and yet whenever someone says, "My right to free speech is bein
120.
by soerxpso 2y ago
If it's not true, it serves as a good example of why journalists should report on all alleged crimes without hiding information from the public: when you have a system where people know that certain allegations will not be reported for

More ›