sodkmfkwegw

4 ms·

1.
by sodkmfkwegw 4y ago
Sounds like you know the difference between the two programs then.
2.
by sodkmfkwegw 4y ago
Sorry about that, I meant to write "discretionary" in there. Regardless, the point of spending less on the military still stands. We can't change mandatory spending or we have millions of elderly people dying because social s
3.
by sodkmfkwegw 4y ago
It's not about our "standard of living", it's more about class mobilization. If you were born poor, you could still get a job at McDonalds, go to college on those wages, and buy a home/start a family and live middle
4.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
That's the same argument as : If nuclear weapons are superior to all weapons, no need to ban them!!
5.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
It sucks that the company screwed over their loyal customers by forcing future updates of the ring behind a subscription service. I was about to pull the trigger on the 2, and they announced the three the next day with the subscription serv
6.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
Your solution isn't going to work. No one really "polices the police", and LAPD literally has 18 different gangs within the department. This is why the push for body cameras is so strong- there is no other way than to monitor
7.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
I also hate it- Tolkein survived WW1 and would probably hate that military companies are looking to him for inspiration
8.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
What a dumb-ass comment. If we had normalized guns and everyone was carrying a gun everywhere, a few beers would likely result in many gunfights lol.
9.
by sodkmfkwegw 5y ago
It's insane that a company that prides itself to "Bring the Truth to Light" does shady shit like this. Disgusting lol