socialhack3r

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by socialhack3r 7y ago

   UK Parliament's report has a sample agreement that Facebook had with companies that whitelisted them and gave them extended access to user data when they publicly represented that the APIs had been deprecated
2. 2.▲
   by socialhack3r 7y ago

   This article helps explain it: https://medium.com/@six4three/how-facebook-sold-your-data-an...
3. 3.▲
   by socialhack3r 7y ago

   Folks should check out this article that explains how Facebook intentionally did not pass along privacy metadata to developers. Shows how a lot of the so called "breaches" happened. Hint: they weren't breaches, it was privac
4. 4.▲
   by socialhack3r 8y ago

   Criminals seem unlikely to follow laws, so why bother having them? Of course devs would need to intentionally follow the privacy wishes of users but without metadata, even responsible developers who want to, can't. I guess my question
5. 5.▲
   by socialhack3r 8y ago

   Oh jeez. So you think that medium article is accurate? It would be pretty nuts if what they are saying is true. Makes something like Cambridge Analytica and whatever happened today with At The Pool be a question of "when" and no
6. 6.▲
   by socialhack3r 8y ago

   This other article that got posted today might explain why this happened in more detail: https://medium.com/@six4three/deceit-by-design-zucks-dirty-s... Seems to suggest that FB platform apis were designed to not share