smt88

25 ms·

661.
by smt88 2y ago
Yes there are. The First Amendment is limited by compelling government interest, which (in practice) means it can be fairly arbitrarily by SCOTUS. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/post/what-the-first-amendmen...
662.
by smt88 2y ago
How did you hear that from their team? Do you know them personally?
663.
by smt88 2y ago
What if AI companies control the government, like they do in the US now?
664.
by smt88 2y ago
They're very generous toward citizens, and they're very stingy with who is called a citizen. They're all filled with modern-day slavery in the form if indentured servants.
665.
by smt88 2y ago
There is no chance AI will inspire rich tech execs to give money to all the people whose jobs they've stolen. We're trending toward Saudi Arabia, where an ultra-wealthy class rules society.
666.
by smt88 2y ago
Translation: Meta already needed to lay off some staff and they're using this as an opportunity to build AI hype
667.
by smt88 2y ago
This is a demo. OP is asking for examples of usage in production, where the agent is actually doing work. It's also not really what people are promising with "agentic" because there's a human prompting and assisting it t
668.
by smt88 2y ago
OP wanted this scrutiny and is using it to advertise himself to employers. Any analysis, criticism, or doubt is what he asked for. He should "show receipts" (emails at least) if he wants people to take his word for it.
669.
by smt88 2y ago
I wasn't claiming that sympathy for Mangione is online-only, but rather that being online too much will skew someone's perception of popular opinion. Based on reddit, for example, you'd assume Mangione has more than 50% suppo
670.
by smt88 2y ago
So you think YouGov is part of the same "system" as UnitedHealth?
671.
by smt88 2y ago
We already know nation states like Russia will shill both sides of any controversial topic in the US, so you're probably right. I doubt they're influencing this thread though.
672.
by smt88 2y ago
A lot of terminally online people in these comments are dramatics overestimating popular support for Mangione. It is certainly remarkable that a murderer has such a high approval rating, but he's still not close to being broadly popula
673.
by smt88 2y ago
> Given the choice of equal pay, most people would pick a cheap suburban 2000sqft house with a garden for 10% the price of a SF condo. This already happened during Covid, and no country substantially de-urbanized. In fact, urban real e
674.
by smt88 2y ago
That's because most people live in cities because they prefer it, not because their office was there.
675.
by smt88 2y ago
Anyone who has seen Musk's aggressive censorship/shadowbans of people he dislikes on X will know this is partisan nonsense. Meta shouldn't have gone as far as it did, but let's not pretend all political speech is treated
676.
by smt88 2y ago
It may save money, but it is also exactly (to the letter) what Trump's FCC and FTC appointees have said they'll demand. US conservatives are waging a war against fact checkers because (unsurprisingly) they are more likely to have
677.
by smt88 2y ago
TypeScript on the strictest settings + aggressive ESLint rules is incredibly strict and a fantastic target for AI code. It's a good practice to have the CI/CD server reject code that fails ESLint anyway.
678.
by smt88 2y ago
If Silicon Valley could tell the difference between utopias and dystopias, we wouldn't have companies named Soylent or iRobot, and the recently announced Anduril/Palantir/OpenAI partnership to hasten the creation of either Sk
679.
by smt88 2y ago
If remembering unimportant syntax differences between languages (e.g. "===" in TypeScript and "==" in everything else) makes you a good programmer, then yes. Or if remembering how to assign variables in stored procedures
680.
by smt88 2y ago
You can't "run the spreadsheets" on a business with >0 fixed costs. You'd have to be able to predict future demand to know per-customer cost. Pricing is always based on intuition.
681.
by smt88 2y ago
> Freestyle is good enough already In my experience, the quality control isn't very good (some patches will read much more accurately than others) and accuracy isn't that good when you get out of normal ranges. I don't
682.
by smt88 2y ago
There is absolutely no chance this works well enough to be useful, and it's arguably extremely unsafe if a gullible diabetic person thinks they can rely on it
683.
by smt88 2y ago
I have zero faith that OpenAI respects attempts to block their scrapers
684.
by smt88 2y ago
Every large tech company only survives because of H1b labor.
685.
by smt88 2y ago
It has happened. Farming is heavily regulated in developed countries. Will it be regulated further? Maybe not.
686.
by smt88 2y ago
Eating animals wasn't "normalized". It is normal. We couldn't exist as a species without that adaptation. The problem now is the scale and methods of farming that meat. Reducing meat consumption is a worthwhile pursuit,
687.
by smt88 2y ago
You went long on some fairly general assets. That's not gambling. The problem with gamblers is (for example) making risky bets on margin and ending up losing massive amounts of money because a meme stock lost 5% of its value during a n
688.
by smt88 2y ago
This is certainly already happening because TikTok and YouTube are packed with AI content
689.
by smt88 2y ago
Israel is holding large numbers of women and children in jails without trial. They're hostages too, which is why Hamas has been able to occasionally exchanged hostages with Israel.
690.
by smt88 2y ago
TikTok said it wasn't exfiltrating data and turned out to be lying. I don't really understand the argument that this is a First Amendment issue. TikTok was asked to protect its users from CCP surveillance. It didn't. Now the

More ›