Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smsm42
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
571.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
If you're already running an unverified third-party installer, your system is gone. There's nothing Firefox addon signing can do to save you at that moment. You are already at the "running arbitrary code" stage.
572.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
> the problem is that twitter has as much censorship as before, might even have more Would be a stronger claim if it were accompanied by any evidence. Say, can you name five most prominent political figures booted from or silenced by X r
573.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It is a fact that twitter is less censored that it were before Musk. It's not 100% censorship free, but less censored. The fact that you think some of the things that aren't censored anymore should be, because you disagree with t
574.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Nobody pays ang income tax on loans, it's not unique to Musk. And loans need to be returned, usually.
575.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
> quick to reach for a description that includes people who want Jewish people dead Never heard him being called Columbia University or Harvard student.
576.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Does anybody remember mega bailouts of 2008 still? There are so many companies that arguably won't exist without those. And that's only one example, there are massive subsidies, tax breaks, preferences, etc in a ton of industries
577.
▲
Tesla Releases Results of 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(ir.tesla.com)
60 points
by
smsm42
2y ago
|
105 comments
578.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Normies don't know what the "addon" is and likely would have IT to install them anyway.
579.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
What's strange in it? I've been using macs and android phones for over a decade. And a lot of tech savvy people do the same. Macbooks have been a solid dev platform for a while, and do not really require any mobile platform prefer
580.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
No Linux or Android, which makes it useless for anybody having any devices running those. And since nobody wants to use two password managers, it remains a better solution to use a truly multi-platform one.
581.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I think we're at the point where we need to ask, how the fsck supposedly "open browser" prohibits their own users from installing extensions they want to install? I mean, I get signing - if you want signing, you can use it. I
582.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Then I suspect it's just cowardice.
583.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I am wondering about the Autodesk example. If they suck so much and the users hate them so much, why no competition have arisen? Are there some government induced barriers? We saw Microsoft has been an unassailable incumbent on browser mark
584.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Does Mozilla have any assets or workers located in Russia? If yes, this could be the reason, as the censors won't hesitate to go after them, and the law in Russia is whatever Kremlin says it is. If there aren't then it's just
585.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
That's why you always have people to either copy-paste error messages or send screenshots. Because people are terrible at reading and even worse at reproducing what they read.
586.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
There were - and are - a lot of companies vying for those sweet subsidies. And most of them can't make it work even with subsidies. Maybe Toyota with their prius is getting anywhere, the rest are mostly a footnote. And yet, Musk comes
587.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
You are implying that the company that seeks less regulation necessarily does it because it's of lesser quality and this is the reason they can not abide by stricter regulations. I don't think this assumption is true.
588.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Most buyers would require mortgage or another kind of loan. For a loan holder, the question is monthly payment, not price. Higher interest means higher payments, thus negating the decrease in prices. Of course, for cash buyers high interest
589.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
The problem is they have zero incentive to make for-fee service to be any better than the free service. What are you gonna do, turn to somebody else for the same service?
590.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It doesn't. Even with insurance, etc. I doubt they spend this much. They pay below market for most positions I've seen (though their benefits are on a good level) so even with taxes, overheads and all I don't see where 500k w
591.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
This just shows how broken and insanely anti-consumer Big Tech is. You have to pay 200 bucks for somebody to look on the down low into your account being randomly disabled... and everybody pretty much accepts it as normal. Very dystopian.
592.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I was just thinking the other day about writing exactly this post. I've been many times on the hiring side as the interviewer, and now also am on the employee side. On both sides, the process looks extremely broken and extremely frustr
593.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
That happens anyway - nobody's payroll dataabse is running on leetcode puzzles, so if you hire somebody, they must spend time - sometimes months - on learning the new systems and getting the lay of the land and how the things are done.
594.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
But when companies would "filter" you out because your resume didn't match some stupid algorithmic quirk, you have no way to even get to an interview without mass-filing to any opportunity that at least somewhat resembles the
595.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It's not the skills problem. Looking for a job, I know that my skillset would match the employer - in fact, thousands of employers likely - because I have successfully done such jobs in the past. But I have no way to prove it to a pote
596.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
It's not a head poll, it's who has influence. One NYT columnist has more influence on the politics of the society than 1000 people in rural Appalachia. Influence is not distributed equally, it's very heavily skewed.
597.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
So, you extend the definition of a religion to "everything a lot of people support" and then declare that it needs to be "brought down". How does it work for you - you plan to ban people from agreeing on anything, and th
598.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
Yes, when they famously declared "there's no sex in USSR" it was because USSR was a theocracy.
599.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
I think a lot of people are a little bit Shintoist. That's one of the reasons why we have museums - we regard things as some kind of reflection on people and events, and a chair in which a famous person sat or an instrument they played
600.
▲
by
smsm42
2y ago
That ad is the most cringy ad I've seen for a long time, which is a hard bar to clear. It makes me physically uneasy. And if you analyze it, it says "no matter who or what you are, a giant corporation would crush you and put you i
More ›