Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smortaz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
181.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Microsoft | Redmond | Fulltime | Onsite Looking for: Senior Software Engineers + 2 summer interns Our team works on various tools for data scientists and web devs. These include: Visual Studio (R, Python plugins - mostly C#) Visual Studio C
182.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Yep! This started life as the PTVS (Python Tools for VS) REPL and now Python, Node.js, C#, R, ... are using it.
183.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Another data point on Anaconda from microsoft's Azure ML team - we've been using Anaconda for the past few years and have been very happy with it. One key feature we like is that we can deploy a nearly identical suite of pkgs on
184.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Sure. It can go from very basic: * Right click on a data frame & "Open in Excel" (to view, chart, massage, etc.) but one way to something more elaborate like we did for PTVS/Pyvot (two way): * https://www.yout
185.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Personally speaking I would love for that to happen. There is room for both an XL IDE and a XS IDE imho.
186.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
An excellent question! Please take this survey so our mgmt hears you :) https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RTVS1
187.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Yes. Hopefully when/if we doe VSCode/R it'll be fully open source.
188.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
RStudio is a fantastic IDE. It's been under development for years by some of the smartest ppl in the R community. it's currently decidedly better than RTVS. There are things here & there that RTVS might be better at, but th
189.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Not sure what you mean - RTVS works with CRAN R...
190.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
what phillc73 said. Totally respect having a focused command line w no frills workflow. To each their own. But you should really give RStudio a try. It's a beautiful, highly productive R IDE with many features that make writing R much
191.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
For Azure ML, some people use it fully in the cloud, others do local work in their favorite IDE, usually RStudio, then upload scripts, do their training, opertionalization, etc. on Azure. If you are using standard R, Python (eg scikit-lear
192.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Brilliant idea! We do take PR's :)
193.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Aha, my bad. Yes, for certain scenarios it makes sense to have a drag/drop paradigm, for some a REPL++ like Jupyter, and sometimes an Editor. That's exactly why we decided to integrate Jupyter w Azure ML. This is going the othe
194.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
I think you are referring to WCF? Basically being able to create a model, then operationalize it on the cloud for mass usage? If so, the good news is that you can do that with RTVS, thanks to the R SDK. Basically you create models local
195.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
There are no such plans. But we have VS Code, which is great lighter weight IDE that's cross platform. Check it out here: https://code.visualstudio.com/ It has great support for js, node, go, .net etc. already. We&#x
196.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Understood. RTVS itself is 3MB's. Hopefully you won't have to install VS more than once or twice a year as it's several Gigs... Speaking of a web page, our team also did "Jupyter notebooks as a Service" on Azure ML
197.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Correct, CE version has restrictions. It's great for checking out RTVS to decide if you want to upgrade to Pro/Enterprise.
198.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Hi folks - Last year we polled HN on whether there'd be interest in R integration in Visual Studio. You said "YES!", so here it is! I'll be around in case you have any questions. BTW RTVS was built by the same group tha
199.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
It definitely does! In fact with the Community Edition it becomes a perpetually free R IDE. edit: see gnoway's comment below tho.
200.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Team lead here - yep, we'd love to do a VSCode/R version as well. If you want to lend a voice, take our R IDE survery and upvote that question: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RTVS1
201.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Thanks rogerbinns - Understood, just wanted to make sure you were aware & it looks like you are :). I've pinged the VC++ team and will report back. BTW we've setup the alias pythonbuildtools at microsoft.com where folks like
202.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
IronPython has been in the community's hands for a while. We do support it in PTVS, but that's about it. Curious - did you consider Qt?
203.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Thanks ableal - improving pkg installation is under heavy discussion currently. We'll take a look. Cheers.
204.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Thanks tanlermin. We are aware of nuitka and in general very excited about the various Turbo options that are showing up for Python. Our own effort is pyjion and we have a talk at PyCon 2016: https://github.com/Microsoft&#x
205.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Thanks for the heads up. It turns out that we are now much closer to the SQL team, so I'll ping the owner listed on that page & get an update.
206.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
roger - 1st a big thank you for the wonderful service you provide. I assume you are aware of this: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2015/11/02/announcin... The python team actually pushed for this
207.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Hi, team lead here. Very Happy to see this on HN. If there are any requests for the team pls feel free to voice them. Smiles, frowns, ... Anything from making pkg installation easier to cross platform dev tools. Cheers.
208.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
if the speedups pan out, that is the plan! the work on performance has not been started yet however.
209.
▲
R coming to Visual Studio
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
smortaz
11y ago
|
0 comments
210.
▲
by
smortaz
11y ago
Dear HN, Our team did PTVS (Python Tools for Visual Studio). A few months ago we asked HN if there would be interest in R in Visual Studio. The response was positive. These are very early bits, but it should give you a general flavor of wh
More ›