Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smorrow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
61.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
It should be easy to do flowcharts in pic (1). It's also more diff-friendly. GNU pic can target LaTeX directly, if that helps.
62.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
The trick seems to be to avoid subvocalising (where possible).
63.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Competitiveness, for one thing. Then there's the play deprivation, which isn't too good for the social skills in general, and externalises your locus of control. The topic at hand, paranoia, or at least distrustfulness, is practic
64.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
If there's one thing we've established by now, it's that unsolicited instruction doesn't work: * Merrel et al, "How effective are school bullying intervention programs?" * Smith et al, "The effectiveness o
65.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
You sure we're not behind the Stone Age? The mainstream paleoanthropological position is that hunter-gatherers were completely egalitarian socially. Inequality is something that came up (resurfaced actually, because apes have it) onl
66.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
A single staff can switch between different clefs, if you ever want to redfine what lines mean what notes. Then you can switch back to the normal treble clef. That double treble clef is called the super-treble clef and I've only ever s
67.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
The only reason I even know what this is is that I just happened to go on /r/all that day out of boredom. And I go on Reddit, like, every day.
68.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Oh, and there's already a notation within the standard system for your first proposal: a treble clef with "8vb" written below it.
69.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
The more sharps or flats the key has, the more the need for putting them in the key signature, not less. Otherwise there'd be sharps and flats everywhere. And you wouldn't be able to determine the key by looking at one bar. Expe
70.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
The best way to do that stackable staves: see the last two lines here: http://i.imgur.com/tqZRXzt.jpg Ledger lines preserve the melodic contour but it's harder to read the notes. 8va's stay within the regular five
71.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
It's "Notes on (the paper ) 'Plan 9 From Bell Labs, 1995', 2012"
72.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
diff
73.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
This is a perfectly valid comment until it's proven wrong. I don't think it should be "LA LA LA I'm not list-en-ing"-downvoted.
74.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
In the case cancer, I heard the reason it's good is that the cancer cells die off faster than the normal ones do, when they're not being fed.
75.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Might just be a case of more intelligence => more depression?
76.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
If that were the sole reason, then men would be looking for women that are funny, too. They're not, so there's more to it than that.
77.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Downplaying it.
78.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Single System Image.
79.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
That's true, but it's also true that you can only add so much stuff to the syllabus, and then there'll be too much school. You've got to draw the line at some point. Why not draw it at boring computer stuff that barely a
80.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
You can teach maths on a blackboard. Can't teach maths on a whiteboard. Don't ask me to explain it, but it's true.
81.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Maybe his thought process was that giving the age twice ("elderly" and then "70" -- do you need both?) would be redundant, so that the redundant number might not be an age.
82.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
and the reason I'm saying that is that the main argument against me on that subject seems to be: "rape is very bad because rape is very bad". also: the posts were shadow-deleted. also: I can't even comprehend how sensiti
83.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I can't remember everything I've written, but I don't see that anything's been deleted. I'm sorry if I can't accept it as an axiom that all rape is equally bad... Are you. seriously. saying. that just because s
84.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I think he'd weigh up the pros and the cons.
85.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
First one is great (and better) in all respects except line width, but I didn't need that new page to tell me that.
86.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
> It's the generalisations across entire genders Do you take everyone so literally? > horrific attitudes to rape. ... I'd roll my eyes, but I'm not American enough. What's being discussed is barely even rape at all
87.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Acting shocked at something doesn't make you right. What can I say, I just can't see how there's much difference between 1) a woman being very forward with you and 2) a woman being very, very forward with you. There is a di
88.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I may have been exaggerating when I said mental health+, but it's still a fact that men still aren't getting laid as much as they would ideally like to=. I mean, how would you even know? Because they aren't begging for it con
89.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Having the same name as an often-violent crime doesn't automatically mean something is that bad. Squashing an insect and setting a mouse trap are technically killing, but there's nothing wrong with them. I think you first need to
90.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
heh. Is there any part of that that's concretely not true? Humans all over the world have come up with it independently -- I dunno, unless Muslims and Mormons shared notes. I could even go further and claim it to be an almost pan-mam
More ›