Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smoldesu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
661.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
In fairness, the performance/size ratio for models like BERT still gives GPT-3/4 and even Llama a run for it's money. Their tech isn't as product-ized as OpenAI's, but Tensorflow and it's ilk have been an essen
662.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
...right. But AI did not invent the concept of automated email spam or wire fraud. I don't understand how this all relates to model jailbreaking.
663.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Well... I kinda think it's the same problem? You have designed a system in error if you are trusting an AI system to handle that sorta thing. We have programmable logic to handle payments and emails and all the stuff that's actual
664.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
I think the preeminent issue is that AI is just not trustable for anything that matters. You cannot rely on an unaccountable stochastic model to handle important stuff like money.
665.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Maybe so, but it seems clear that the surveillance goes both ways: https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2023-09-23/us-dip...
666.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
> In yet another global first, China has become the world's first nation to deploy a commercial data center underwater, China Daily reported. That's a bit of a misleading hook. China may be the first nation to deploy this, bu
667.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
> regardless of any benefits Wayland may have over X, I won't be using Wayland. That's fine. I don't really know what your 'mystery feature' is, but I feel pretty certain it's on a Wayland roadmap somewhere.
668.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
You can render decorations server-side, it's just not guaranteed that the client will respect it. If you really want a Qubes-style SSD desktop, it's attainable in Wayland although it will look incredibly ugly and be highly redun
669.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Probably so. Relative to PopOS, not many of them are quite as pre-customized (not that it's an inherently good or bad thing).
670.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
> I don't know what Popos does to make it more "gaming focused" than vanilla Ubuntu. They have a few changes, chief among them being the PopOS scheduler which I find to be quite effective: https://github.com
671.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Oracle has an extremely generous free tier, as long as you register a credit card with them: https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/FreeTier/freetier... > All tenancies get the first 3,000 OCPU h
672.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Wayland was never going to be fully Xorg compatible. It's not just that it would be a massive effort, but it conflicts with core Wayland concepts relating to isolation and security. If keystroke access and window properties were stil
673.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
> Was it really worth it? I mean, yeah, I'd say so. Browsers and terminal emulators are working, so that will cover 90% of the Linux userbase's needs. XWayland runs fine for non-Wayland apps and supported GPUs run smooth as but
674.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
https://developers.google.com/search/help/crawling-index-faq > Why isn't my site indexed? > In general, the most common reason that a site is not indexed is because it's just too new; be patient an
675.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
The majority of people who choose to be child-free are doing just that - making a choice. Unless you are referring to the extreme minority of people who castrate or kill themselves to avoid conception, you're not actually describing pe
676.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
People who remain child-free their whole lives generally don't plan it to be that way. It's the sum of cumulative questions asked at multiple points in your life: "am I ready to raise children?" We aren't predesti
677.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
It's not artifice to point out that most contraceptives are not permanent, and don't prevent child-free people from choosing to have children later in their life. Calling those individuals an "evolutionary dead end" is e
678.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
The main difference is probably that Linux has a dozen+ desktops and (even ideally) multiple desktop implementations to support. Windows has just one, and they update it continuously (not to say it works perfectly either). In the end, Windo
679.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: No Technologies: Linux/UNIX administration, DevOps, Docker, Rust Résumé/CV: Available upon request. Email: smol@toast.cyou
680.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
...which is back around to my original point: > For mobile games, sure. For desktop titles, nothing has really changed. So I will ask again: what is the renewed incentive to port to Mac?
681.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
And here's the Alien Isolation announcement from two years earlier: https://www.macrumors.com/2021/12/17/alien-isolation-game-re... And the Tomb Raider 2 release date announcement from 2 years before tha
682.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
For mobile games, sure. For desktop titles, nothing has really changed. MacOS runs the same APIs, Apple still refuses to make compatibility promises, and older titles are perpetually phased-out of support unless they are constantly updated.
683.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Privacy isn't achievable, at least not with American commodity hardware. The government works quite hard to ensure the NSA, CIA and FIVE-EYES are well-fed.
684.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Exactly. Game Porting Toolkit is an awesome showing, but the intention is in the name; it's not a compatibility layer, it's a porting tool. Eventually it will go away, and you'll be stuck with the same Mojave/Catalina-st
685.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Maybe that would be an apt analogy if you didn't agree to an EULA limiting OpenAI's liability as terms of using their service. Your only path of recourse as their customer is leaving the platform.
686.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Caveat emptor.
687.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
> I can't help by think of Pagliacci when chatgpt tells me to go see a specialist for my problem. You are the specialist. This has been a thing since the beginning, no? Arguably it's the right response too, an LLM is not gettin
688.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
Thank god my largest investment in their success is a single Quest 1 unit.
689.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
"without any results whatsoever" is a bit of a stretch, the Quest 2 shipped ~15 million units and there are more headsets on the way. Now, I'm not exactly sold on the vision of a global metaverse capital, but even the origi
690.
▲
by
smoldesu
3y ago
All of this finger-pointing over a messaging protocol basically confirms to me that wealth is a curse on America. We deserve the imminent collapse of our supply chain and the ruthless surveillance of locked-down hardware to make people ap
More ›