smaudet

71 ms·

841.
by smaudet 5y ago
Not really the point - they have 5% market share with those B2B products, and a history of axing stuff that they don't think makes enough money.
842.
by smaudet 5y ago
I don't know, it really doesn't sound like a real CVE - maybe add some setting I guess for those worried? Others bring up good points, if your attacker can write to C:\ you probably have other issues. On top of that, it breaks com
843.
by smaudet 5y ago
saneclang, saneswift, (sanegcc?) cli wrappers around clang, swift which fix the insane porcelains of those toolchains. We built a million GUIs for these, why did we never build CLIs for bad CLIs?
844.
by smaudet 5y ago
So (had to look it up) Reader was infamously the shuttered project that first caused a lot of backlash...that went for 8 years. They closed it due to "declining usage" i.e. they could not monetize well. Play Music died after 9 yea
845.
by smaudet 5y ago
I think that's the point, they do not experience acceleration in zero g, which is the point of testing visual/aerial cues, which DO remain in free fall (electric fans, horizons). I'm fairly sure you just read this backwards,
846.
by smaudet 5y ago
> While I disagree with your argument about game engines being bad for games Why? How are they good for games? My argument is that 'games' are stagnant, boring nonsense, unless you want interactive movies. What counterpoints do
847.
by smaudet 5y ago
Game Engines Suck. There, I've said it. Most 'games' are in fact interactive movies, with very little game in them. That's what Game Engines enable. I'm vote we stop calling them Game Engines and instead call them I
848.
by smaudet 5y ago
> I hate coding stuff that I know could be better expressed with a visual graph or say, an animation curve. I hate coding animations in CSS, but I enjoy watching them in e.g. devtools. I really wish I could see the representation of my c
849.
by smaudet 5y ago
I rarely see a piece of art that is 'new' or interesting - if you check out an art forum, you see a lot of duplication, similar motifs. Nobody has innovated with art in a very, very long time. I guess you can argue stories are all
850.
by smaudet 5y ago
> "IIRC, Sweeney said (on Twitter) that in the past, it was a burden to constantly be designing and maintaining language bindings for scripts, especially with a rapidly changing engine." Why do you think that is? I mean essenti
851.
by smaudet 5y ago
It is hard to express how much I disagree with you, but I'll take a stab: > What is safer: one hand on the wheel or two? Unless you are riding in a derby, in high wind conditions, or on ice, this is a bad argument. In those conditio
852.
by smaudet 5y ago
Except it isn't. I guess it's not fashionable to talk about old cars anymore, back in the day cars were "simpler" i.e. fewer specialized components, less computer more mechanical component. Whether the cars were better o
853.
by smaudet 5y ago
Maybe tax the companies which could provide work from home but decide for dubious, unproven reasons, not to. A majority of petrol costs come from commutes - sure brick and mortar might require some commuting, but the vast majority of white
854.
by smaudet 5y ago
"However, a thermostat is a solved problem." Sure, maybe in a stationary room, and I can think of plenty of times when I have used my heating or cooling system as not a thermostat. Not a sovled problem in cars... I can also think
855.
by smaudet 5y ago
Fewer (in charge) developers makes for a more stable product - even open source products fair better when they have a long term maintainer versus ownership changes frequently. The other thing is style - when used well, state machines don&#x
856.
by smaudet 5y ago
You'd be surprised the garbage overhead brings into an app architecture... These best practices really only make sense in large organizations, i.e. Conways law. After all, you can't really ask 100 developers to all add code to one
857.
by smaudet 5y ago
Part of learning to be an adult - growing thicker skin, a backbone, and ALSO understanding that everyone is different, learning to navigate that rather than just get frustrated or upset like you are two-year-old.
858.
by smaudet 5y ago
A couple things: A) People have vastly different (even abusive) forms of communications. What works for one group does not work for another. "Sensitivity training" does not account for this, in fact it causes issues. B) EQ and CQ
859.
by smaudet 5y ago
So what its a circle jerk of people putting up with BS, then going through BS again because they did so well the first time? I mean, maybe their other job isn't doing great, because they clearly have all this time to interview, wonder
860.
by smaudet 5y ago
I think his point is the most consequential issue is the RNG, which to me makes a sort of sense. You can never be truly secure and eliminate all potential concerns (what if there are invisible people with nanotech in your house - not a know
861.
by smaudet 5y ago
Hmm good points, but you also ignore the power costs here - using oscillators, open pins as thermometers and rf antennas requires additional power draw, not to mention modifying these devices may be nearly impossible due to their embedded n
862.
by smaudet 5y ago
To be fair I don't think this is really the same - if I understand correctly, app servers were always a poor approximation for actual co tainers. Browser containers may be better, but you share the same problem with app containers that
863.
by smaudet 5y ago
Yeah like other snide comments mention - not sure this is that useful or something we really want. Like, I get the company wanting to sell services to people who might do wasm stuff, the whole quip about cross platform CLI? I don't thi
864.
by smaudet 5y ago
It's not defamatory though - if people decide "yeah you probably suck" but its because of what someone else said, it's arguably up to them to show the person who originally spoke was defaming. You can't sue journali
865.
by smaudet 5y ago
Makes me almost wonder what management is actually good for, besides a high level filtering system... I like continous pair programming, but not because I actually continuously pair - if someone wants to watch me work, or is too green to go
866.
by smaudet 5y ago
As you stated, other professions disbar, disqualify, ban, in addition there are civil, criminal penalties for (gross) negligence. I'd not be worried about "honest mistakes" so long as a juries are involved, with respect to sp
867.
by smaudet 5y ago
Yikes. "All write operations were unable to function during this outage, including git operations". I know git does not need to consult any database but its own when committing. Auth is solved with tokens and url matching. I get t
868.
by smaudet 5y ago
That's not a reason to use Google Pay - I want a system which I can directly block. Credit Card allows me to do this. Billing through Spotify might make it harder to unsubscribe, but I can still block my card. Rather not need to fight
869.
by smaudet 5y ago
I find it telling you need to distinguish - I do think interface has come to mean closer to "contract".
870.
by smaudet 5y ago
Actually the other protocols all exist, and work fine, thanks. The major exception was high bandwidth communication, where it remains cost prohibitive to do without scale - video has come a long way, to be sure, but large image, audio, vide

More ›