Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smallnix
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
In oauth2: when I /1 associate a random uuidv4 for each new flow with my user (server side), /2 stick that uuid into the state parameter, and then /3 look up my user with this on callback-endpoint execution. Isn't PKCE i
92.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
Well, I wouldn't love Batman in my apartment either.
93.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
Unlike the article, your comment, does not provide evidence beyond "sniff test". The article brings up paintings of statues, which is an interesting data point.
94.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
And an article "experts are trolling public" creates more attention than "experts stick to evidence and aren't artists"
95.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
> the risk What is the risk really? I mean put in numbers.
96.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
> at the Department of Defense *Department of War
97.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
TL;DR: inside trading /s
98.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
> Acronyms are abbreviations for meaningful names. I think often words are added to allow for a memorable name, such as crispr > When Mojica and Jansen struck up a correspondence, they began tossing around catchy names for the pattern
99.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
That's not the point of the article. It's about Claude/LLM being overconfident in recreating pixel perfect.
100.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
What is the difference between "storing carbon" vs. "trapping carbon"?
101.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
Do you mean cause Thiel says he based the core of his beliefs on Schmitts teachings, a fervent nazi? Don't get the connection otherwise.
102.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
I recommend to read the source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/peter-thiel-...
103.
▲
by
smallnix
10mo ago
The flow diagram for yes/no attend meeting is missing to weigh the estimated impact you can make against other meetings. Even if I can contribute real value to 20 meetings which I am invited to, I can't attend all of them.
104.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
> Who's to say there isn't something out there we haven't discovered yet Occam's razor? We should work with as few assumptions as possible to get a model with the largest scope. Otherwise we get stuck with a hard to f
105.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
AI bubble wrap or AI insulating foam?
106.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
> I’m not charging. No paywall. No “freemium” trap. Just pure value. This had me drop out of the article..
107.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
> They only upstream some bug fixes that would be too onerous to keep in their private fork. Are you arguing that more good things would go upstream if it were licensed non-permissive or are you giving an example were it works well enoug
108.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
Babies would go nuts over this, so much contrast and movement
109.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
I see myself more as a code mentor and value-creation coach
110.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
The important bit is adjective vs. noun. Adjective: female doctor vs women doctor (guidelines recommend to use female, there is discussion about this but not much) Noun: I dated three females vs I dated three women (guidelines clearly recom
111.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
I was also thinking of refractory periods with neurotransmitters. But I don't know much about this.
112.
▲
by
smallnix
11mo ago
At least some projects run longer I understand: > Last year China completed a project, begun in 1978, to plant a 2,000-mile-long belt of trees
113.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
> This is the first time I see anyone indicating there is a connotation for objectification there. Happens to all of us, we are all inside our small information bubbles. The curious engage in broader conversation, such as us on HN. Let m
114.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
> using "man" in the "mankind" context isn't really a misuse or inherently sexist I understand the ethymologic perspective, but the above statement is part of on-going discussion. E.g. > To refer to all human
115.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
I should have been more precise, I meant one-sided objectification. I thought the point would come across with my 'OR' example.
116.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
I was disqualified by the military from serving solely because of my sleep disorder.
117.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
I missed that one, thanks. This changes the optics on this for me. I guess I am more attuned to this when the topic is "'sex warfare' by beautiful Russian and Chinese young women on nerds".
118.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
Good example for the extreme lengths people go to. Yet there is a huge difference in effort of fathering a child vs. pregnancy and delivering a child. Regardless of the parent in either case disappearing afterwards.
119.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
>Attractive female whom men What is it on the Internet with calling women 'females'? I'd understand if you had written 'males' and 'females' OR 'men' and 'women'. This indicates an a
120.
▲
by
smallnix
1y ago
> Never did I ever meet anyone in the militar The military disqualifies people with severe sleep disorders.. Nice survivor bias example. Note, I can't speak to this particular case.
More ›