skl131313

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by skl131313 4y ago

   D doesn't do it very well. Carbon doesn't require you to write your own interface. There's also problems with extern(C++) not correctly generating the appropriate assembly. Lots of ABI bugs as it's rolling it's own
2. 2.▲
   by skl131313 4y ago

   I love when people bring up that UE has a GC, if it was written in Java, do you think they would have built a GC on top of Java's GC? I guess it depends on the GC at that point, 20 mallocs isn't a lot but like the GC in D, it paus
3. 3.▲
   by skl131313 4y ago

   There's no "nogc" containers in phobos, or allocators, or an idiomatic way to do safe manual memory management. It expects you to do it the C way. It's also impossible to implement some things because of how D does movin