skinfaxi

7 ms·

151.
by skinfaxi 2mo ago
The replacement is on a url/host basis.
152.
by skinfaxi 2mo ago
The agent has no access to the secret. It has a placeholder that is replaced at a higher level. When it makes the network request the secret is substituted but that is outside of the caller's worldview.
153.
by skinfaxi 2mo ago
> How does this look once agents are superintelligent? Who cares? We're dealing with reality here on the ground.
154.
by skinfaxi 2mo ago
That doesn't make sense. It's similar to if I ask an LLM how to get my wife to stop nagging me and it hires a hitman to kill her. That's obviously what I asked!
155.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> Sure but the cops aren't going to pull you over based on what you think about Chinese policy. You might be surprised to learn that China has operated clandestine prisons in the US! https://www.justice.gov/archives&
156.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Which one?
157.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Things like thumb drives physically connected to cabinets can just disappear in your environment with no followup whatsoever? And that's regular, expected, and desired?
158.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
So if I make a new object that can kill you, I can try it, see what it can do, etc without liability? We already have computer programs that inflict damage on computers. Is AI new in that regard? If companies are spending so many resources
159.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> Prosecutors bring charges even if the estate doesn't pursue. > Simply wrong. You didn't refute my point :P Wait so I only need to make a company and use AI to hack US banks and anyone else I want?
160.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
>If you were shot or a member of your family got "deleted" and you had sufficient control of the estate, then you would have standing. > Obviously, if you aren't involved you shouldn't be able to sue and be compens
161.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
The unpredictability should be constrained though. Just like how you are never supposed to point a gun at someone/something you want to exist. Ever.
162.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Someone (or some group) made the thing. I can't just create a bomb and leave it alone and when it goes off blame the bomb.
163.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
What point are you making? This hasn't been brought to court yet and I am lamenting the fact that charges have not been brought. > There is already precedent on more or less this exact scenario. Except you usually don't call pe
164.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> If you think "unguided" means "I typed a prompt into claude code and waited yolo" I don't know what to say but, you have a very different idea of what professionals do than I do. What exactly does "unguid
165.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
It's artificial intelligence. If you treat something like a person and delegate to it, how can you later say you didn't trust it would execute your commands faithfully? And how wouldn't you be negligent in delegating a task t
166.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
I had actually posted a link to that but edited my original comment. I appreciate your comment.
167.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> If you shot up a public area and then tried to claim that was a business activity, you would obviously not have an argument. It isn't plausible on its face. So I'm really not sure what point you're making. I'm runni
168.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> If it doesn't disappear, then it's hanging right there for any of the competitors to use. That's a problem for the original installer's ongoing employment. Is that really an issue? Do PLC vendors have concerns about
169.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Since when are human actions categorized as being a consequence of nature? Does that let me steal or murder without consequence?
170.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
So we can have vicarious liability for banal stuff like contractors but not for AI?
171.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Abusers say "that's just how I am" which is my point. Just because it's his nature doesn't mean it is at all natural.
172.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
That's exactly my point. Labelling him as inhuman gives him a pass, like how we don't criticize hurricanes as malevolent.
173.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
This is a conspiracy I can get behind.
174.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Some of us are labelled as bots, much like dolphins getting caught in fishing nets. I guess it's not material since it's not life or death (yet? if access to essential services is gated by bot detection we are all screwed).
175.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
> The brittleness and difficult of writing the code. The extra complexity. The cost of bugs. And ease of creating performance degradations. If you are even asking that question, you probably don't have the experience to even have an
176.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Law does not constrain at all. Law only operates after the fact.
177.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
What I meant was that there is no moralizing of natural force, which this metaphor tries to equivocate. Oh, it's just like the wind, don't get in Larry's way!
178.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Weird, we don't absolve murderers of guilt by saying they are an lawnmower.
179.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
The best is that the article frames it as "Autonomous hacking is here. Governments are not ready". As if someone didn't authorizing turning the damn thing on. > TO LOSE CONTROL of one artificial intelligence may be regarde
180.
by skinfaxi 3mo ago
Do we hold metasploit accountable when it leads to a hack? Why do we absolve the human actor in the case of AI?

More ›