skarap

15 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   Never understood why debian ended as the distribution of choice of the DevOps-related movements. Ubuntu is understandable - developers used it on their desktops so when they orderer their first VPS, they chose ubuntu. But why debian? Also w
2. 122.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   > The way developers somehow think DevOps is (or should be) an abbreviation of "Developers doing/replacing Operations" is terrifying to me. And what about the way management thinks that's when you don't have to p
3. 123.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   And how would you expect it to work? Keep the repo in ~/.local/ or something like AppData? What happens then if you want to have two clones of the same repo? What if you want to move a clone around (e.g. to a different machine)? O
4. 124.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   If you don't accidentally expose your credentials in .git/config to push changes to the repo (e.g. GitHub username/password for http auth) there is no risk. Still - having a real deployment process is much better. It could be
5. 125.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   Now someone should write an S3 storage backend for ceph and it's ready for production deployment in AWS!
6. 126.▲
   by skarap 11y ago

   > The problem I see sharing salaries is that people tend to overestimate how good they are. Absolutely. Gather 10 people from a company in a single room and I really doubt they will be able to agree on it. Especially when it's not e