sjsizjhaha

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   It’s like the google claim. There was a years worth of work up front, but AI took the typing from a few days to a day.
2. 2.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   > ronacher I think he’s soured a bit on the 10x claim echoing many of the quality concerns expressed by others in this thread: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/1/18/agent-psychosis/
3. 3.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   > Things have changed drastically now, engineers with these tools(like claude code) have become unstoppable I’ve spent the last week unwinding my coworkers slop who said the same thing.
4. 4.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   Generating code was always cheap. That’s part of the reason this tech has to be forced on teams. Similar to the move to cloud, it’s the kind of cost that’s only gonna show up later - faster than the cloud move, I think. Though, in some case
5. 5.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   The corollary here is there’s 2 cases here: 1. You know exactly what the code should look like ahead of time. Agents are handy here, but this is rare and takes no time at all as is 2. You don’t know exactly what it should be. Building the m
6. 6.▲
   by sjsizjhaha 8mo ago

   > the smart ones know you have to babysit and double-check -- so it's not remotely a replacement. This has been the big one for me. Of all the best devs I know, only one is really big on AI, but he’s also the one that spent years in