sjfjsjdjwvwvc

11 ms·

91.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
No idea - do you know?
92.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Copyright has to be abolished for the good of all humanity.
93.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Well sure but why blame it on sci-fi? Sounds to me like those people would create the torment nexus with or without sci-fi. It’s not like it’s super hard to come up with the concept of e.g. colonising Mars.
94.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
With rightsholders I mean exactly those big corporations who do nothing else but buy up copyrights to successful art. I for example have never benefited from copyright, neither from GEMA (the German artist association for musicians) - 99% o
95.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Reread my comment again. If your __only__ motivation is money, you will have a problem. I agree it’s necessary to pay artists - but we don’t need copyright for that! There are many tried and proven alternatives.
96.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Im happy to pay the artist directly - which is why I use services like bandcamp or buy artworks directly from artists I know personally. I care little about paying „rightsholders“ and their ilk - so I have zero empathy if they complain abou
97.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
We need stories to be able to imagine and build the future. I empathise with the author but he doesn’t really offer an alternative
98.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
This is an centuries old argument. Most people don’t create to make money, they create because they __have__ to. If those motivated purely by money stop creating little of value will be lost
99.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
If making money is the only reason to create maybe it’s good if they stop.
100.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Don’t worry there are many people out there who have copies of it all, there is no way they manage to get the cat back in the bag even if all governments work together on this. But yea get your own copies whenever possible
101.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Please ban all these AI companies, at this point I have enough OSS models, don’t really need any hosted service anymore. IMO would be best if this stays a highly illegal technology that is only available to a few weirdo nerds /s
102.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Or another „copyrighted“ droid for that matter, after all it’s a classic. Same with robot cop, what the hell did you expect to get… Or Italian plumber with red hat with M on it, that’s just a description of Mario
103.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
The German industrial base was not totally destroyed after WW2. Especially in western Germany most of it was still good and they had to rebuild little to get it going again. The myth of the Trümmerfrau rebuilding Germany into a Wirtschafts
104.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Which war did the US win post WW2? Afaict they all ended in stalemates and eventual retreat (Korea,Iraq,Vietnam,Afghanistan,..)
105.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Few things make me more furious than the constant „computer says no/knows better“ one has to deal with on so many occasions these days, be it mobile apps, websites or other
106.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
So you need a legal process to determine if that generation was actually infringing on copyright. IANAL so I have no idea really, and I think most of the other commenters here can’t say for sure either.
107.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
That is for a judge to decide probably
108.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Is a definitive legal ruling even possible? Looking at music for example there are still many cases being fought over stolen melodies and that’s been a thing for generations. I think it’s going to go a similar way with „AI“ - lots of court
109.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
I would say it depends on the details. The generated image are clearly derivative and not pixel perfect recreations
110.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Absolutely baffling comparison, not sure what you’re trying to say
111.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Who was making any money in this instance? I’m not super familiar with midjourney but it looks to me like he used the free version
112.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
I read it on the same site, didn’t check the actual report to confirm: https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5049241/linux-foundation-now... Edit: checked it, figures are on page 158. they still spend 7,8 M$ on Linux ke
113.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Agreed it’s not a fair comparison. And I would love if Firefox gets more adoption (again)! I have converted a lot of people in my bubble - also in general FF seems a lot more popular in EU than in the US, not sure why…
114.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
From an earlier discussion on here: >the "health benefits" of ice cream are not explored because the scientists "do not believe in them" Hence the „might be“. So there have been some positive effects, but no deeper in
115.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Last time I checked the Linux Foundation had a similar problem, spending 2% on the Kernel development and the rest on the latest tech trends, AI, blockchain, metaverse etc.
116.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Hm weird I have the inverse experience with Chrome…
117.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
IMO it’s mostly because it’s a miserable job that few would be willing to do. I at least wouldn’t, no matter how many millions they throw at me - even disregarding all the career ladder climbing that is needed to be considered for such a ro
118.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
I don’t know if we need a new one. Firefox is still a good (the best?) browser IMO. Developing a new one is really difficult and many more intelligent people than me have failed doing it. But if you feel like you have to act, do so and do
119.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
I would love to believe that.. Same as next year will be the year of mass adoption of Linux by consumers. Yet history and trends point in the other direction
120.
by sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y ago
Or blockchain, Or metaverse, Or something else utterly useless that no one wants or asked for

More ›