sjaiisba

4 ms·

1.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
> 3. Regarding me specifically, I work on the LessWrong codebase which is technically open-source. I feel like calling myself an "open-source developer" has the wrong connotations, and makes it more sound like I contribute to a
2.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
> Anthropic claims they solely use agents to code and don't modify any code manually. Have you used CC? It shows. They did not make their fortune off this, and it’s at least lost me a customer because of how sloppy it is. The model
3.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
All your competitors benefit from your training costs. They’ll lose on inference pretty quickly if they stop training new models, no?
4.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
> As people say - something changed around Dec/Jan Yes, Anthropic decided they wanted to IPO and got the hype machine in full swing. Don’t get me wrong LLMs are here to stay but how we’re currently using them is likely going to chan
5.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
Only a personal anecdote, but the humans I know that have used it are all aware of how buggy it is. It feels like it was made in 2 weeks. Which gets back to the outsourcing argument: it’s always been cheap to make buggy code. If we were abl
6.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
Yeah, it’s odd watching the outsourcing debate play out again. The results are gonna be the same. Which is a shame, cause I think LLMs have a lot more use for software dev than writing code. And that’s really what’s going to shift the indus
7.
by sjaiisba 8mo ago
AI has been a lifesaver for my low performing coworkers. They’re still heavily reliant on reviews, but their output is up. One of the lowest output guys I ever worked with is a massive LinkedIn LLM promoter. Not sure how long it’ll last tho