sir_smurf

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sir_smurf 10y ago

   I found this to very shady. He claimed that he first started with the fake news to: "then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction" But then why didn't he stop when that didn&#
2. 2.▲
   by sir_smurf 10y ago

   No, this isn't obviously true. Criticizing and critical thinking isn't the same thing.
3. 3.▲
   by sir_smurf 10y ago

   I would guess that he/she means that if there was sane sex ed in school, then seeing people having sex on tv wouldn't make kids have unprotected sex any more than seeing violence on tv would make them go around killing people.
4. 4.▲
   by sir_smurf 10y ago

   yes, I don't think that facebook cares so much about the america perspective of the picture, nor do I think that it's the major point for most people complaining about the censorship, but it is that little extra twist. Compared to
5. 5.▲
   by sir_smurf 10y ago

   I would guess that censoring a head of state is what made most people react. From my European perspective: This is a case of an american corporation imposing censorship based on american values (that almost no european care about) on an Eur