simurgh_beau

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by simurgh_beau 1y ago

   Apologies for the very slow reply; I had mistakenly assumed this thread was inactive. You have raised an absolutely critical point about trust in the platform vendor. The problem you mention, is indeed a major hurdle for any system where th
2. 2.▲
   by simurgh_beau 1y ago

   Apologies for the very slow reply; I had mistakenly assumed this thread was inactive. Hi discarded1023! Thank you for the kind words and for the excellent pointer to Professor Ehud Shapiro's work. I've had a chance to look through
3. 3.▲
   by simurgh_beau 1y ago

   Apologies for the slow reply; I had mistakenly assumed this thread was inactive after the first day. You have put your finger on the single most difficult technical challenge, and I appreciate you focusing on it. How does the system defend
4. 4.▲
   by simurgh_beau 1y ago

   Apologies for the very slow reply; I had mistakenly assumed this thread was inactive. This is an excellent critique, and it gets to the heart of the protocol's design. You are right to point out the risk of a "tyranny of the major
5. 5.▲
   by simurgh_beau 1y ago

   Apologies for the very slow reply; I had mistakenly assumed this thread was inactive. Thank you for sharing this; it's a fantastic reminder. I was actually introduced to the concept behind Pol.is a few years ago on a BBC Click Persian
6. 6.▲
   A Treatise for One Network – Anonymous National Deliberation [pdf](simurgh-beau.github.io)

   13 points by simurgh_beau 1y ago|10 comments