sigwinch

11 ms·

211.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
The necessity for any sophisticated packaging is itself a factor for the terminal Nova classification of ultra-processing.
212.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
What about cocoa powder (which is fermented and dried and separated at least)? And coffee? Does it matter whether you buy beans and grind them yourself, or offload that grinding to a processor person?
213.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
Actually, according to the Nova Wikipedia page, the packaging of potato chips would push them into UPF. The actual, non-edible bag with the slogans and other soothsayings.
214.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
Just like other parts of science, that organization can be discussed and tested. It’s the opposite of “we asked the King what foods we can be most proud of”. Linnaeus did this, and allowed himself to be wrong, and I argue his organization a
215.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
So rather than apple juice, consider watermelon juice. The nutrition and fiber are unchanged, the volume is close to 1:1. But you can drink more than you can eat.
216.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
I don’t get the downvotes, this is a good question. I would prefer that the meat substitute market is allowed unbounded processing; and that the mere addition of nitrates to meat categorizes it into the terminal ultra-processed category.
217.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
History shows periods of opaque infighting within a closed circle of security barons. The west did not know Khrushchev was positioned for power until that ring met with Eisenhower for arms talks, and Khrushchev was the one standing next to
218.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
It’s well documented, Latvia, Poland, and it takes time to build the case so there are probably more. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/may/04... https://meduza.io/en&
219.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
As of October, Russian efforts via Telegram are associated with the seemingly-spontaneous swarms around places like The Hague. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-cyberespionage-gig-...
220.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
9 September is probably where you want to start. Intentional swarm of military drones into NATO. Shahads shot down, no question about a Russian plan to test reactions along the perimeter. Since then, coordinated launches of screens of small
221.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
A few people have great information on drones. Why would they become sources for RT?
222.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
On the topic of what Putin wants , I’m increasingly swayed that domestic politics limit the choices he’s given. I wonder how the same siloviki but a different leader would perform. On the topic of a wide drone attack coinciding with land i
223.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
I heard it’s a mix. Suggestible local people on Telegram are coaxed to launch civilian stuff at a time and place. This clouds the sensor data of the true launches. I don’t know if we’ve seen Shahads since 10 September, but note that Shahads
224.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
In my experience, interest from sociology promoted it to those writing A/B testing. It’s not that the difference in a degree in applied statistics and a degree in data science demonstrated frequentist versus Bayesian.
225.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
More interesting is JD Vance suggesting citizenship should be gated on fighting in a civil war.
226.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
“If you had the opportunity to inject pig-butchering scenery into our banking app, would you flee the country after its executed?”
227.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
There is something of value it produces: The relationship between politics and finance has lost accountability. Would you take a chance investing with just any cryptocurrency? Or will you make the wise decision and choose mine, the first
228.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
So it’s not involved in a criminal investigation. Then it’s a loyalty test. Specifically, it reassures them you can keep a secret.
229.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
Good article. The toxic secret is that a class of these exist, like myristicin in nutmeg. And that nature can alter coumarin into dicoumarol, yet has no obligation to announce it.
230.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
Note that this is based on data from a substack post with a major retraction: https://www.construction-physics.com/p/i-was-wrong-about-dat...
231.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
The story is about “new applicants” and positions with no access to classified material. It is not illegal to share unclassified material, which is why DHS was having NDAs passed around. > DHS said it was "unapologetic" about i
232.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
DHS and Musk’s people confirmed it. See Reuters back in May 21.
233.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
And if you stop doing it, you now have a group who were polygraphed and a group who were not.
234.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
In particular, Panorama showed Proud Boys marching after Trump’s speech, when they’d actually left before. The founder of NewsMax says that lawsuit is going nowhere. But this does get the latest Epstein fallout off the front page. Epstein
235.
by sigwinch 11mo ago
In another thread, the edits of Trump’s Jan 6 speech by Panorama were called “fake news”. Seems to me that the more-problematic edit was showing the Proud Boys after Trump’s speech, when in fact they left before. But it’s not like Trump i
236.
by sigwinch 1y ago
I think you’re discounting what a physically-unacceptable soldier can do with a drone.
237.
by sigwinch 1y ago
The top brass in Canada would benefit to know who among the civil service has circuitry and dexterous control skills. And if it were me, I’d like a high-res scan of each person with the intent of precomputing who could convince ICE software
238.
by sigwinch 1y ago
You and I probably agree that Trump didn’t get to say what he actually wanted to say. I assert those two lines come closest. The attentive watcher might see the cut (two different camera angles) and put in the effort to watch the 50 min.
239.
by sigwinch 1y ago
Or, the one awarded a cross by Hitler. I can’t tell when someone quotes Ford today, who might they think is today’s Henry Ford .
240.
by sigwinch 1y ago
The topmost graph on Wikipedia is about GDP, and when it comes to children-per-village, you’re absolutely right. But down some is the J graph, which looks like the American graph in the link I posted.

More ›