siftrics

25 ms·

271.
by siftrics 4y ago
Because it's profitable for Yuga Labs to do that? They're a business making a business decision. They know users are more likely to participate in the community in the future if Yuga is willing to cover costs out-of-pocket. Again,
272.
by siftrics 4y ago
> pick a chain with a stable valuation and guaranteed low fees There are numerous chains with sub one-cent transaction fees which have tokens pegged to the dollar. I can move arbitrary amounts of an asset which is 99% correlated with the
273.
by siftrics 4y ago
> Imagine if you had to... Given the historical context of these systems working reasonably well for decades, I've decided to take for granted that I won't get rugged by my public transit, or my electricity company, or the food
274.
by siftrics 4y ago
You literally said > So, you argue some value exists in __Bitcoin__ as a political tool to subvert dictatorial influence; what exactly does that do to justify massive compute requiring fees 10-100x greater than the transaction value and
275.
by siftrics 4y ago
Honestly, I agree. It can both be true that 1) a system could be improved so as to reduce harm to the average user and 2) ultimately the users are responsible for assessing risks before participating in the system. The problem is as soon as
276.
by siftrics 4y ago
I don't understand how that contradicts what I said. I'm not arguing against public goods. And I'm not arguing against improving systems for those who don't do due diligence. I'm just saying take responsibility for
277.
by siftrics 4y ago
>Isn't this something someone can already do on established markets in the physical world? Name one trustless, permission-less system that avoids the double spending problem. I would love to know about it. >Isn't this exactl
278.
by siftrics 4y ago
> what exactly does that do to justify massive compute requiring fees 10-100x greater than the transaction value and associated use of real-world energy? You're confused. Bitcoin does not have such fees. Ethereum, while it does have
279.
by siftrics 4y ago
Yes they did. They knew that transaction failure is a risk and they accounted for it. I don't feel bad if they did not do their due diligence before attempting to transfer thousands of dollars of ETH.
280.
by siftrics 4y ago
Red herring. I'm not arguing for any system that has the power to rug their constituents, crypto systems included. Crypto at least enables systems to be built. It's up to you to either trust it without any due diligence or read th
281.
by siftrics 4y ago
You make a good point, but this is still a step in the right direction. This offers users the chance to flee their country and retain their assets. Good luck getting your assets out of a legacy banking system in such a country.
282.
by siftrics 4y ago
It's not the duty of anyone except myself to understand the risks of my own actions.
283.
by siftrics 4y ago
Because they know more than surface-level details and understand that trustless, permission-less financial systems offer a huge amount of value, especially to those in less-developed and authoritarian countries, who are regularly abused by
284.
by siftrics 4y ago
Those who submitted the transactions _knew_ the transaction fees before submitting. They voluntarily and intentionally paid these fees. This is not broken.
285.
by siftrics 4y ago
They are absolutely "crypto people." They have had nigh the most crypto engineering power of any firm in the entire world for like 5-6 years now. They have literally hundreds of extremely smart people who have been in crypto since
286.
by siftrics 4y ago
Jump is a privately held proprietary trading firm. There are a very small number of shareholders (though, to be pedantic, the correct term is "member" rather than "shareholder" since all the related US organizations are
287.
by siftrics 4y ago
This has nothing to do with the fact that wormhole is "a cool sci-fi word" that's "easy to spell, easy to remember, and easy to build a new brand around." Jump wants this domain because its Wormhole Network already
288.
Bahamas to Allow Citizens to Pay Taxes with Digital Assets(coindesk.com)
1 points by siftrics 4y ago|0 comments
289.
Most Major U.S. Airlines Drop Mask Mandates on Court Ruling(bloomberg.com)
12 points by siftrics 5y ago|2 comments
290.
by siftrics 5y ago
Assuming your generic functions take _pointers_ to Components as input, full monomorphization does not occur and you're suffering a performance hit similar in magnitude, if not strictly greater empirically, to interface "dereferen
291.
Expulsion of the Chagossians(en.wikipedia.org)
4 points by siftrics 5y ago|2 comments
292.
by siftrics 5y ago
You might want to check out the Katakana and Joyo Kanji courses then! https://libre.study/courses/7/ https://libre.study/courses/29/ Let me know why the site sucks and I will be eternall
293.
Libre.Study Adds Multi-Terms and Tables(libre.study)
1 points by siftrics 5y ago|0 comments
294.
I made an app to learn Hirigana (ひらがな) with Flash Cards(libre.study)
12 points by siftrics 5y ago|3 comments
295.
Learn Solana with Flash Cards and Spaced Repetition(libre.study)
1 points by siftrics 5y ago|0 comments
296.
Think for-loops are easy? Despise non-trivial SQL? Try LATERAL JOIN(twitter.com)
2 points by siftrics 5y ago|0 comments
297.
Schrödinger's CRCs (2010)(citeseerx.ist.psu.edu)
13 points by siftrics 5y ago|5 comments
298.
by siftrics 5y ago
.
299.
by siftrics 5y ago
I do not think about each word before saying it. When I think, it’s a mixture of 1) hearing my voice and 2) thinking in purely abstract concepts and relationships without putting English to it. When I want to think in English, I can hear it
300.
by siftrics 5y ago
So you’re unable to “think” a sentence word for word? You cannot think the sentence “If I were to grab that apple, then I would be holding it in my hand”? You’re unable to hear yourself say those exact words in your head as if you spoke the

More ›