sieveoferos

4 ms·

1.
by sieveoferos 8y ago
This is not great reporting by the BBC. Most grievously, as others have mentioned, they don't mention the dosages this guy was taking. The important point to grasp behind all this concern over "supplements" is that there&#x27
2.
by sieveoferos 10y ago
That's a pretty good idea IMO. Give cops the same as Google's 20% time, to help with things that bug them (which probably also help the communities they're serving in).
3.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
"Arch Villain or Arch Agent?" http://journal-neo.org/2015/06/12/paul-calder-le-roux-arch-v...
4.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
I agree there's a legitimate question about the legal basis for the FBI's request. But assume rational behavior on the part of the FBI here: if they had a more solid legal basis for the request, why wouldn't they use it? The
5.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
I believe you, but cite please
6.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
I agree with the general sentiment of "don't get rid of things only because they make certain jobs more difficult" - but I don't think the FBI is arguing for getting rid of encryption. I think they want to be able to b
7.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
I actually wouldn't bet on that. As much as I dislike the FBI based on previous behaviour, I'm happy Comey is running it now, because he seems to have a fair amount of personal integrity. I wouldn't rule it out completely tha
8.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
I'm still hoping for something like the "calculus of statement" described in Heinlein's "Blowups Happen." I think that a plurality of axiomatic approaches and formalisms is always better - consider the dialogue
9.
by sieveoferos 11y ago
http://www.fauxvictorianrag.com/2012/12/religion-and-the-dec...