sieve1234

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sieve1234 12y ago

   That's really funny because something similar was done at my unversity (I think with bats, or maybe even flying foxes). I declined because although the devices were really small and they assured me that the animals did not come to harm
2. 2.▲
   by sieve1234 12y ago

   I doubt that. I know there is research in sensor network (e.g. at my university) and they say they want ulta-small low-power devices but the experiments I have seen were never in need of that much small devices. Of course there are applicat
3. 3.▲
   by sieve1234 12y ago

   I am unsure about this. It's big advantage is its size and that it does not require as much HW support like Linux (like a MMU). The disadvantage is that it's not a *nix and you loose the whole ecosystem (no Posix). In my opinion t
4. 4.▲
   by sieve1234 12y ago

   I think such sieve examples do not do languages a favour: It is slow and it's not true, that the Java code is that long. However I agree that it's nicer in Haskell, but the naive variant as given here (and often in fibonacci examp