sidhu1f

5 ms·

1.
by sidhu1f 6y ago
For the heavy lifting of the actual linear algebra computations, these tensor computation libraries typically use some variant of BLAS or eigen.
2.
by sidhu1f 6y ago
There was a time when GCC had to be installed by compiling from source. Doing so involved compiling the GCC source with the native compiler, and then using the resulting binary to compile the GCC source again. I remember the install instruc
3.
by sidhu1f 6y ago
See https://www.planetcom.co.uk
4.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
Wouldn't GPL v3 be as effective as AGPL in this context?
5.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
My statement (as can be seen from its GP post) uses convenience to mean ease of use, not in the titles available sense that you (and the two following posts) do.
6.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
Is BitTorrent more convenient than Netflix?
7.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
Top of the line Arria-10 FPGAs have about 1500 floating point MACs [1]. Using such a device, Intel claims ~1 TFLOP sustained for GEMM, the standard matrix multiply operation [2]. [1] https://www.altera.com/content/dam&#
8.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
Even calling them Hindu-Arabic would be preferable to the usual custom of labeling them simply Arabic (for e.g. in LaTeX).
9.
God Mode: Modal Interface for Emacs Users(github.com)
1 points by sidhu1f 8y ago|0 comments
10.
by sidhu1f 8y ago
Some of Mcron's innovations[1]: > The new idea is to read the required command instructions, work out which command needs to be executed next, and then sleep until the inferred time has arrived. On waking the commands are run, and t
11.
by sidhu1f 9y ago
Modern alternatives to BIND that I have had good (though limited) experience with: - unbound (recursive resolver) https://www.unbound.net - nsd (authoritative server) https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/nsd
12.
by sidhu1f 10y ago
The GNU Artanis[1] web framework seems interesting... [1] http://web-artanis.com
13.
ARM (Dual-core Cortex A7) based desktop and laptop(crowdsupply.com)
13 points by sidhu1f 10y ago|2 comments
14.
by sidhu1f 10y ago
Not exactly, ME even without AMT is scary[1]. [1] https://libreboot.org/faq/#intelme
15.
by sidhu1f 10y ago
A majority (if not most) of the contributions to the Linux kernel come from developers paid to do so by the likes of Intel, Google, IBM etc. [1]. Do you have any reason to believe that said for-profit companies would have contributed to the
16.
by sidhu1f 10y ago
What makes you so sure that, had the GNU stack been BSD/MIT licensed and as popular, that Microsoft etc. would not have come out with products featuring the same software but with proprietary extensions and closed licenses?
17.
by sidhu1f 10y ago
Well, as per the coreboot docs [1], the panic level is only 9000+... [1] https://www.coreboot.org/Binary_situation#Intel
18.
by sidhu1f 12y ago
There are some sound technical reasons for choosing scheme: http://wingolog.org/archives/2011/08/30/the-gnu-extension-la...