sidewndr46

7 ms·

91.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I guess that is true, although you'd be hard pressed to prove that. I don't think any court would hear a complaint about a lower court or adjacent court having participated willingly in parallel construction.
92.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
Isn't Microsoft the same group that still won't allow you to write "import <cstdint>" in C++ ?
93.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
Didn't many states eliminate or raise those for large categories of violent crimes? This means that a rape today for example could be prosecuted decades from now
94.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
In terms of physical evidence? None.
95.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
Parallel construction means the judge doesn't know.
96.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
The individual who would prosecute them also needs to work with them to prosecute civilians. So pretty much, so long as it isn't murder.
97.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
The case was a shooting. It seemed remarkable they had neither a gun, spent cartridge cases, blood, flesh, wounds, or anything in the way of physical evidence.
98.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I don't think that is ever admitted into the public record or presented to a jury. An expert reviews it and prevents the conclusions. In the even that you had the knowledge to review it yourself, you're excluded from the jury as j
99.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
The judge doesn't care if the law was violated in collecting evidence.
100.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I think you're missing the slippery slope that this goes down. The criminal charges were way too low, given the alleged actions. The state admitted it had absolutely no forensic evidence. The judge was perfectly fine with this and sele
101.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
one of the more fun things I learned during criminal court in Texas is that the absence of forensic evidence cannot exonerate an individual. The prosecutor and the judge covered that despite not having any forensic evidence, the jury would
102.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I think what they mean is the A380 never made airbus any money. It makes plenty of money for many airlines
103.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
The Lockheed L-100 Hercules does exist and is apparently a civilian C-130
104.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I find the whole thing a little odd. The 747 seems to be a great aircraft. It's also a quad jet and the change in regulations for ETOPS makes twinjets a no brainer for reducing cost. There's no reason to hurry and up and get rid o
105.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
This seems like an odd version of the story. My understanding is Boeing designed lots of military aircraft, not all reached production. The 747 is the result of some of that design work.
106.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
That'd pretty much defeat the point of having local government. If politicians can't get their hand in the cookie jar, what's the point?
107.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I'm reasonably certain when I ordered linux CDs in the 90s, no one put a limit on the time frame I could be using them
108.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
Why in 2026 do these indictments have the lousiest black and white photographs ever? I've seen the high quality images in color from the government. Can they not be used during the grand jury process?
109.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
is this vehicle actually available for purchase at $24,950?
110.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
if you're a current equity holder they're undesirable. If you're buying in or buying more, no real reason to avoid a down round so long as the company is viable
111.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
do startups typically receive interest on their investment rounds?
112.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
depending on who you ask, the failure is not one of AI. It's a failure of management to adopt enough AI.
113.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
As others have pointed out, LastPass is often chose for compliance. Not for security.
114.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
Lifetime earnings in the US is less than $2 million for most individuals. John Carmack is all of 55, he potentially has decades of life ahead of him. It's important to realize that Carmack was very wealthy even back in the late 90s. He
115.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
unless I'm mistaken John Carmack is unbelievably wealthy. Like give away a Ferrari and start a rocket company for fun wealthy. There's a number of people who read this and conclude that the message is you can't push someone h
116.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
well by 'more' emissions you'd mean infinitely more since most dual sports will be a 4 stroke engine.
117.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
your statement was "The police can only stop a driver". This is completely false. It is based off the belief of the officer, not fact or reality.
118.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
No? Not even close. If the police "smell weed" they can stop you. If the police believe you have active warrants they can stop you. If the police believe you have committed a criminal act of any kind, they may stop you
119.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
It's legal because the government allows it. How else would it work?
120.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
I don't think you can use the ones at wal-mart without an internet connection of some kind

More ›