4 ms·
The case was a shooting. It seemed remarkable they had neither a gun, spent cartridge cases, blood, flesh, wounds, or anything in the way of physical evidence.
by sidewndr46 4mo ago
The case was a shooting. It seemed remarkable they had neither a gun, spent cartridge cases, blood, flesh, wounds, or anything in the way of physical evidence.
- s1artibartfast 4mo agoThe question remains what they did have.
- 8note 4mo agopresumably the local noble didnt like them, and the jury knew to follow along. the south is also known for putting people in prison without even having a charge. just a guilty result
- sidewndr46 4mo agoIn terms of physical evidence? None.
- s1artibartfast 4mo agoEvidence, not physical evidence. The instructions seem entirely reasonable. There is no hard rule for physical evidence. If other evidence is enough to convince 12 jurors beyond a reasonable doubt, it could be very significant.