sidenote

3 ms·

1.
by sidenote 5y ago
Did I mention natural behavior? Did the comment I responded to mention natural behavior? How is natural behavior relevant to the discussion between OP and I? What is the point that you are arguing and why are you taking it up with me? F
2.
by sidenote 5y ago
There is a lot of incentive to flood well-meaning discussions with vitriol in order to bring the political temperature up. Most people that do this aren't even trying to be trolls, they are caught up in the fury of those around them.
3.
by sidenote 5y ago
This is very well known information. Sources are easily available on the news source of your choice. https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/animals/2019/11/i-am-sc... https://www.nytimes.com/20
4.
by sidenote 5y ago
The article that is linked reads "observations", plural.
5.
by sidenote 6y ago
Can you prove that they have stopped improving their technology? Marketing is one of the most dishonest fields out there, I would prefer that voting system companies (much like I’d prefer that pharma) not focus on marketing. Do you wish tha
6.
by sidenote 6y ago
So the entire system cannot be trusted and is entirely vulnerable to fraud, but all elections are not fraudulent? So the big bad guys are only being fraudulent once in a while, even though they get away with it every time. I don’t understan
7.
by sidenote 6y ago
Do you believe all American elections are most likely stolen unless someone presents you with facts that satisfy you? Trump, Obama, Bush, all the result of rigged elections too? What could ever satisfy you that you know, without a doubt, ho