Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shykes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
I don't think the terms de facto and de jure mean what you think they mean. At this point it appears you're just throwing fancy words at me, and are not able to make a coherent point or meaningfully address mine. So, let'
62.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
In the absence of a counter-argument I can only assume that you don't have anything of substance to offer on this topic.
63.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> "The exception of Area C" is doing a lot of work in this argument. That's 61% of the territory of the West Bank Area C is less than 10% of the Palestinian population in the West Bank, 6% of Palestinian population if yo
64.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> I shouldn’t even have to argue here If you don't like to argue, may I suggest not making controversial claims on controversial topics, in a place that encourages constructive debate? > Access to the West Bank is controlled b
65.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
I agree. But it is not Israel who is disenfranchising them - it is the Palestinian Authority (in West Bank) and Hamas (in Gaza).
66.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> The person you're responding to said they were unable to vote in Israeli elections. They said Palestinians are "a large portion of the Israeli population [that] is disenfranchised". That is a wrong statement. Palestini
67.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
There are reports that Ali Khamenei has been killed: https://www.iranintl.com/en/202602280738
68.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
There is nothing obvious about that statement. In fact it's catastrophically wrong. Palestinians in Gaza have been governed by Hamas since 2006. Before that, they had been governed by the Palestinian Authority (Fatah) since 1994. Pales
69.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47199047
70.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
100%. In another comment [1] I drew a parallel with the Al-Ahli hospital incident in Gaza. Once you understand basic information warfare tactics, they're easy to spot. Why newsrooms still fall for it so easily is the real mystery... I
71.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> Unfortunately they visit this site regularly and police it against honest reporting about their crimes. I think that's called "disagreeing".
72.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> Israel has a large portion of its population completely disenfranchised. Care to elaborate? As far as I know, this is false. All Israeli citizens 18 or older can vote; there are no voting restrictions based on race, religion, gender
73.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
This reminds me of the Al-Ahli hospital incident in Gaza, when a mysterious explosion at a hospital was immediately blamed on an Iraeli strike - first by Hamas, then by the international press. A precise death toll was immediately available
74.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
> The software is free (citation: Cuda, nvcc, llvm, olama/llama cpp, linux, etc) If you factor in the cost of integration and ongoing maintenance - by humans or llms - it is not free. But it certainly has never been cheaper.
75.
▲
by
shykes
8mo ago
Commodity hardware and software will continue to drop in price. Enterprise products with sufficient market share and "stickiness", will not. For historical precedent, see the commercial practices of Oracle, Microsoft, Vmware, Sale
76.
▲
Infamous Gang of 40 Leader Banned from Wikipedia
(neutralpov.com)
13 points
by
shykes
9mo ago
|
4 comments
77.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Here's some context from one perspective (mine) on the Docker side: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46735247 (I don't know of any T-shirts saying "we don't accept pull requests". That sounds ma
78.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
The trademark policy does. In any case I meant it in an informal software engineering sense: it's bad form for a packager to distribute upstream software under its original name, with substantial modifications beyond what users would e
79.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
As far as I know, Docker uses the term "bridge" in the standard way, to designate the use of Linux bridge interfaces (basically virtual ethernet switches) to interconnect containers. Containers connect to each other via a layer 2
80.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
I am painfully aware of that narrative. All I can say is that it is a false narrative, deliberately pushed by Red Hat for competitive reasons. There was a deliberate decision to spend marketing dollars making Docker look bad (specifically l
81.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Google developed linux cgroups. IBM developed linux namespaces. Docker developed a completely new application runtime and delivery system, built on cgroups, namespaces, aufs, and tar. This required lots of original design and engineering wo
82.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
It's difficult to tell the whole story in a HN comment, but if you're interested, I did share my experience in a few podcasts over the years. Here are a few that I could find on youtuve: https://www.youtube.com/wat
83.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Yes, I am the co-founder of Docker and also of Dagger. The other two co-founders of Dagger, Sam Alba and Andrea Luzzardi, were early employees of Docker. The companies themselves are not related beyond that.
84.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Yes, of course. I was also an avid user of vserver and openvz on Linux, back when they required patching the kernel, and lxc didn't exist yet. When we open sourced Docker, we had considerable experience running openvz in production, as
85.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Thank you for the kind words! I'd love to show you a demo of the new features we're working on, and get your thoughts. Want to DM me on the Dagger discord server? Or email me at solomon@dagger.io
86.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Exactly. The LLM primitives will remain - we were careful to never compromise the modular, lego-like design of the system. But now we have clarity on the primary use case. Thanks for giving us another chance! Come say hi on our discord, if
87.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Not interested, sorry.
88.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
Imitation is the highest form of flattery! Obviously there was demand for an alternative to Docker that was native to the Red Hat platform. We couldn't offer that (although we tried in the early days) so it made sense that they would.
89.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
The spinning out of containerd is best understood in combination with the launch of Docker Desktop, which was not open source, and later became the main source of revenue. Docker in its entirety was at risk of being wrapped as a commodity c
90.
▲
by
shykes
9mo ago
I would say: listen to your customers. Listen to your engineers. Don't overhire. Pick your battles carefully. Don't tolerate mediocre VPs. All generic advice since I don't have inside information.
More ›