shusain

4 ms·

1.
Show HN: Short Random Workout(shortrandomworkout.com)
1 points by shusain 11y ago|0 comments
2.
by shusain 11y ago
It defeats the purpose if you don't see the ad. Even if you don't plan on clicking on it, seeing it will build awareness of the product or service. That awareness could translate into a sale somewhere down the line (eg. someone te
3.
by shusain 11y ago
Like carbon caps, governments could introduce meat production limits if none of the other solutions pan out.
4.
by shusain 11y ago
Yeah like I said in my other comment - deplorable but not unethical. FB has the capital to provide the service AND make it open.
5.
by shusain 11y ago
I'd be OK with something more subtle, like a mandatory FB account (kind of like how Google does with G+ and their other services). But limiting what they can see on the internet...I wouldn't go so far as to call it unethical, but
6.
by shusain 11y ago
Sensationalize much?
7.
by shusain 11y ago
Some feature ideas they should have tried: real time locations of friends/family (ala Google Latitude), integration with something like Angie's list, integration with something like gasbuddy.com, pull in data from Google Now (be l
8.
by shusain 11y ago
Good ideas are a dime a dozen. Convincing people to become users - that's the hard part.
9.
by shusain 11y ago
The flaw is that it always leads to extreme income inequality. There's no inherent mechanism to prevent it.
10.
by shusain 11y ago
^Plato's philosopher kings. Ignorant folks aren't qualified to decide policy and hence should have no impact on it. I agree to an extant - there needs to be some sort of minimal qualification for elected representatives. Not sure
11.
by shusain 11y ago
It seems like a flaw with Capitalism. In it's pure form, it leads to extremely wide wealth gaps. If history repeats itself, and conditions worsen, perhaps we'll see a repeat of the robber baron era which would then, as it did in t