Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shukantpal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
You can download maps offline in Google Maps
32.
▲
Pitfalls of Debounced Functions
(shukantpal.com)
2 points
by
shukantpal
4y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
> if questioning Trump's borderline coup attempt is too "woke" for you. It seems like this comment was made in bad faith − because the article is not simply questioning the "borderline coup attempt".
34.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
The very important difference being you are not publically showcasing your browser. A more appropriate analogy is buying a card with a gun attached in the trunk or interior. It's weird but not a negative.
35.
▲
Pushing the Limit with Tilemap Rendering
(teamflowhq.com)
1 points
by
shukantpal
4y ago
|
0 comments
36.
▲
Cloudtorus
(beta.cloudtorus.com)
1 points
by
shukantpal
4y ago
|
1 comments
37.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
OP here! I'm prototyping Cloudtorus - a web application to let developers & companies self-host open source SaaS software on their infrastructure. The vision is that Cloudtorus autonomously updates the software and handles any serv
38.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
If you're looking for an alternative, look at Teamflow https://www.teamflowhq.com − but it's a lot more! (Disclaimer: I work there)
39.
▲
Offline Documentation with Webdoc
(shukantpal.com)
2 points
by
shukantpal
4y ago
|
1 comments
40.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
webdoc is a documentation generator for JS / TS and now the sites it generates can be cached offline with the click of a button! I go through how I did it in this post.
41.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
You provide no points to refute my statement. Being bounded between 0% and 100% is irrelevant, unless you think only 100% efficient is not inefficient - which would be absurd due to the impossibility of obtaining an “efficient” label.
42.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
That question assumes the default state is they didn’t exist already
43.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Lmao show the numbers then. Is the cost of printing 75% of the newspaper- probably not.
44.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
“Efficient” is a relative comparison. Any absolute threshold would be arbitrary anyway
45.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
False. The problem is so complex we have to resort to guessing / brute force to solve it; if it's so easy, give me a closed-form solution so I can become rich.
46.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
I’m wondering if for these extreme use cases a bare metal program that doesn’t sit on top of a OS / kernel would be substantially more efficient.
47.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Not really safer "There is no chargeback right however, which can be considered a disadvantage for the consumer using this payment method."
48.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
The question was philosophical not legal. You missed the point.
49.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Are you including the cost of battery storage in solar & wind power generation for 24 / 7 power output? Otherwise Nuclear power is of higher quality since it can be sustained virtually at any time unlike solar & wind
50.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
>> Should auto-manufacturers be liable for emissions produced by cars that have had their catalytic converters stolen? > This is an interesting hypothetical, but I don't see the relevance That's your willing ignorance, an
51.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
No. Backend itself has that same tooling (compiler / build toolchain) and even that isn’t infra.
52.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
The reason the latter is immoral is because common sense tells us no rational person would enter a contract to slavery under reasonable circumstances. That is not true for software.
53.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
> Nah. You're an (extreme) edge case. False.
54.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Cringe way to say 21st century
55.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Yes and? Not a remotely fair comparison.
56.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
Why are you ignoring the regional differences & the other stuff listed above those points in that post?
57.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
The commies are here to give an actual argument, finally. Won't somebody listen to them?
58.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
I'm not a one off 786.
59.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
That's a foolish idea, happy to know it's from a one off.
60.
▲
by
shukantpal
4y ago
That only makes sense if you pay double for using double the packets on another day
More ›