shroedingaway

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by shroedingaway 7y ago

   I attended a Google talk where they acknowledged difficulty in controlling their device. That was given as the motivation for running problems that consist of "random gates".
2. 2.▲
   by shroedingaway 7y ago

   I fired my therapist for asking that too often. Not really. But that is uncomfortably close to the truth.
3. 3.▲
   by shroedingaway 7y ago

   > Or to make a less specific analogy, there is something about the kid's archery that regular archers can't replicate with their archery skills, but it's not really something that anyone would traditionally have described
4. 4.▲
   by shroedingaway 7y ago

   No that's the funniest aspect of the Google result. They barely have any control over what their gates do. Gil makes this point, but doesn't call it out: they're claiming supremacy by turning the challenge around. "You
5. 5.▲
   by shroedingaway 7y ago

   As a licensed quantum computologist (um... not really, but I do work for a major QC effort)... your skepticism is not misplaced. I can only speak for my place of work (not publicly) and pass along scuttlebutt... but, my understanding is tha