shpeak

6 ms·

1.
by shpeak 7y ago
Yep. I was too young in eighties to participate in these discussions, so I can read about them only, and watch some lectures, which is not satisfying enough for my curiosity. Can we discuss something easier? Why you think that photon is imm
2.
by shpeak 7y ago
I'm trying to point out, that current evidence can be explained in different way: by kind of Tired Light Theory. TLT plays well with Pilot Wave Theory and it doesn't need epic events in the past just few galactic hours ago. I&#x2
3.
by shpeak 7y ago
Gravity and EM are holding our galaxy, our Laniakea, our Universe. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rENyyRwxpHo .
4.
by shpeak 7y ago
We can directly measure distance to stars which are near us, using trigonometry and waiting half of year for Earth to make half of distance around Sun. Distance to thousands of stars is already measured with ±5% precision.[0] Yes, it's
5.
by shpeak 7y ago
No. Gravitational waves are causing fluctuations of speed of light in pure vacuum. (See LIGO/VIRGO experiments). So c is constant in steady physical vacuum only, i.e. it's speed of EM wave in medium . If you will change propertie
6.
by shpeak 7y ago
Light scattering assumption is invalid, this is true, so photon losses energy because of an other mechanism. However, newer telescopes discovers more stars and galaxies than predicted by theories of expanding universe, thus favors Tired Lig
7.
by shpeak 7y ago
It's too complex to explain, I will not understand it. Right?
8.
by shpeak 7y ago
Who pumping the balloon? Where is source of this energy? Can we use this source of energy for our own needs?
9.
by shpeak 7y ago
Such counteract action will make lot of side effects, which can be measured. For example, trajectories of separating or oscillating bodies will be slightly curved. Do you have any experimental support for this theory?