showmeevidence

4 ms·

1.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
This is predicated on the evidence, should it exist, of a Russia-backed security incursion being classified a national security secret. While such a hypothetical claim would have questionable value, would it be worth classifying a bit of in
2.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
Russia has denied involvement with this incident in the past[1]. I would encourage considering applying the same standard that we would apply to a trial by jury. Simply indicating that someone is a repeat offender, and would have reason to
3.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
Yes, there are specific exemptions, but a properly worded FOIA request should be able to maneuver around them. For example, Exemption 7[1] would protect "from disclosure information which would reveal techniques and procedures for law
4.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
I'm not perpetuating any particular agenda other than that people should request enough information to form their own opinions. Throwaway accounts for political conversations are an occupational necessity for my line of work.
5.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
Throwaway because I work in a related field. This is a public service announcement: if you haven't seen enough information to prove to you, independent of the claims of the White House, CIA & FBI, that Russia was behind this, you s
6.
by showmeevidence 10y ago
Throwaway because I work in a related field. Folks, now is the time that we need to make it clear that posturing and PR statements do not constitute valid, independently verifiable evidence. As a citizen of the United States, I am beyond te