shove

5 ms·

1.
by shove 12d ago
I’ve been building an offline first animation webapp. CRDT-driven to support eventual team features. Just got tweening working this weekend, exporting to video is next.
2.
by shove 1y ago
The article is about in competence. Incompetence while doing a fraud gets you sent to prison.
3.
by shove 1y ago
I did Thinkpad tech support at IBM right around the time these were discontinued. Great machine, rarely had any problems aside from getting drivers and IRQs configured when folks decided to install Win95
4.
by shove 1y ago
Stamen! One of the OGs at this point.
5.
by shove 1y ago
This is probably the least controversial thing Mike has ever written, so naturally the HN consensus appears to be universal scorn. (And for the record, I don’t even like dogs, but I’m also aware that’s a me problem.)
6.
by shove 1y ago
So the answer to “how are we going to verify that vibe-coded application code does what we think it does is “we’re going to vibe-code the tests too”?
7.
by shove 1y ago
Word on the street was that my Physics professor at NCSSM (Dr Britton) worked on this problem during his doctorate
8.
by shove 1y ago
Downvotes incoming in three … two …
9.
by shove 1y ago
CMD-F “capitalism”: zero matches LOL
10.
by shove 1y ago
Another common conflation is graphic design vs application design. Fusion 360 has strong graphic design and meh application design.
11.
by shove 1y ago
All the videos I’ve encountered from this channel have a disconcerting combination of incredible production value, and highly questionable attention to detail with respect to the information that’s being disseminated
12.
by shove 1y ago
This is presumably sarcastic, but be aware you’re posting on HN where such opinions are held unironically.
13.
by shove 1y ago
C’mon. Everyone wants unobtainium.
14.
by shove 1y ago
I still have the muscle memory for these controls. I was completely gobsmacked when I disassembled it and saw the concentric rings of gears. Very very cool.
15.
by shove 1y ago
Author attempts to use this paper to dunk on Marx’ labor theory of value, but Marx discusses this extensively in Capital: price and value are often interchangeable, but not always.
16.
by shove 1y ago
“Maybe you didn’t hear me, I said ‘good morning steam driver, how are you?’”
17.
by shove 2y ago
That was the only thing that conclusively gave it away!
18.
by shove 2y ago
I read the whole thing, top to bottom, and by the 80% mark, I still wasn’t sure whether the piece was written in earnest or the sharpest piece of satire I’ve seen in a decade.
19.
by shove 2y ago
> If our industry fills with unions, suddenly I won't be able to job hop to positions that look interesting to me. Huh? Says who?
20.
by shove 2y ago
My initial point exactly
21.
by shove 2y ago
I could have sworn that was where this was going in the first place
22.
by shove 2y ago
Since it’s an issue of equalizing the perceptual area in the negative space, there’s not really any reason to throw ML at it. Throw actual math at it.
23.
by shove 2y ago
This has my gears turning wondering what other ultrasonic “lubrication” applications might be possible. Potentially a whole world of industrial and mechanical improvements.
24.
by shove 2y ago
UDP? Websocket?
25.
by shove 2y ago
Read this book last year and, like all of Graeber’s writing, enjoyed it very much despite it going in completely different directions than what I anticipated.
26.
by shove 2y ago
Your comments here and on other threads indicate that you have confused “socialism” with “state capitalism”. An unfortunate and increasingly common mistake.
27.
by shove 2y ago
“… the market was collapsed to socialism …” Whaaaat?!
28.
by shove 2y ago
It’s honestly a huge tell that it was omitted
29.
by shove 2y ago
Another entry to file under You Know The Job Market Is Bad When
30.
by shove 2y ago
Do I even want to know why Ginsberg is being posted to HN?

More ›