Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shortstuffsushi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
2y ago
I was hired after interacting in a comment thread with a founder that was building the same thing I was NIH-ing at my current job. Easy fit to come on since I was currently doing it, but not ultimately a great fit. It pulled me out of my fi
32.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
3y ago
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but I think you have it backwards. It appears that the new array spread being introduced does use two dots, which could mean potential conflict with the existing range syntax?
33.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
3y ago
Adding spreading is neat, but curious why they chose to go the two dot route instead of three. It's been a while since I've worked in C#, so I can't remember if there are any reserved implications of three dots.
34.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I will admit to the same, and perhaps I've missed some buried gem as a consequence, but I think that also speaks to the value of not deeply burying the lede.
35.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
It's funny to me, the length and level of detail defending meetings feels like the sort of meeting content people long to avoid. Paragraph after paragraph, major bullet after major bullet, all to say "there is value in meetings th
36.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
Could you explain why any of the things he says make you think a number that high? I'm just finishing building my first PC ever (I've used computers for ... 20 years? But never actually built one). And I have a 1TB NVMe SSD from W
37.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
This actually leaves me more confused; it seemed like building in public was the problem because it left potential for copying, sharing metrics doesn't seem like it would run a risk? That's the part of this movement in the other
38.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I am also a bit confused by some of what the author has said here. On the one hand he talks about not disclosing things because others are ripping off designs, etc, but in other places he's referring to things like employee salaries an
39.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I know this is a joke, but wouldn't that still leave a you sized hole?
40.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
At least in the case of the scene from the show, it's likely just for the sake of having people to spend this "dead" time with rather than being alone. Possibly also the latter as well, though.
41.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I'm not entirely sure I follow your argument. 1.75MM rear endings occur yearly. Decreasing that number does seem relevant. Could / do these auto-brakes decrease that number? You seem to think no, per your second quote comment - I&
42.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I wonder what the market share makeup would look like for people who want smart appliances. This is another one where most people that I know want as dumb as possible.
43.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I haven't looked into it, but I'm sure studies have and/or are being done on this. I wonder if the rate of incidence of rear-end type accidents has changed noticeably with these systems becoming standard. A quick Google sugge
44.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I would be ok with bluetooth, I think this can be done while maintaining a "dumb" interface though. I'm not much for the backup cam, but there are implementations of it that are also not too over the top.
45.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
For me, the biggest "blind spots" in the last few cars I've had are not covered by any sort of detectors... the front pylons on the windshield have often made me unable to see left and right. I often find myself rolling up
46.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
Huh, maybe the people I know are the exception, but everyone I know gripes constantly "ugh, I wish my car didn't have all this electronic crap, I just want the analog stuff and no computer." The exception for at least a porti
47.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I don't think the original article was in any way trying to imply that the "concubines" were willing participants, inasmuch as they call out their being "slain," which seems rather involuntary. I'm not sure why
48.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
> Is this an actual issue Yes? I mean, it exists and I know of at least a half dozen people in immediate proximity to me that have kept old devices around in case they want their photos later. Some have them backed up elsewhere as well,
49.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
A counter, or perhaps extension example to this: say I had a phone ten years ago that had full disk encryption. Since then, I've migrated to a new phone, but kept the old one around to have access to the pictures. Ten years on, I final
50.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
While the term "fair wage" is obviously something that's more "arguable" (e.g. what's fair?) it seems to me a less loaded phrase than "living wage," the alternative to which, on its face, seems to imp
51.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I think I actually made a comment to this effect recently (although perhaps not on HN? Can't recall now). I think your idea of phrase overloading is an interesting one; often it seems that words lose their severity / intended effe
52.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
Ouch, in a national chain, potential video, potential payment trail... it's too bad that (in my admittedly limited experience), these sorts of things are almost never pursued, because to your point - there's no disincentive to the
53.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I guess in the scheme of "things that happen in a college town," being invited to another party from a public bar with people you just met there doesn't seem like a particularly unusual thing to take part in either. It being
54.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
If you don't mind sharing, what was the reason to get in the car with them to drive? Were you planning to head out to an event like a hike or something that you had arranged online, but hadn't known the people ahead of?
55.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
The Quest Pro is "newly" available now (as of late Oct 22 it appears), but the GP said they had tried last year... I guess now that we're in 2023, that could mean some time in 2022, though. I took their comment to mean that t
56.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
Isn't the Quest 2 the newest headset they offer? Why wouldn't it be fair to try that out and see if it worked, and come to the conclusion that it was underwhelming?
57.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
I don't disagree that there are ways the government can deny you service now, just mean wrt a non-government example like identity theft, you at least have some path forward.
58.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
With this approach, it's not likely to ever improve. If they can't get good talent to come in and "fix" things, it will probably only continue to get worse
59.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
Worth calling out imo, in our current world you have recourse and an ability to "recover" from identity theft (to some extent). If the government controls your identity and revokes some piece, what can you do?
60.
▲
by
shortstuffsushi
4y ago
> in the Hellas basin (where no one particularly wants to land) Why don't people want to land down there? Is it too rough a surface, more so than at higher elevation? Would it be feasible to land outside the basin and make your way
More ›