Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shmageggy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
It was discovered in 2021 that they were a separate species. The whales had been observed there since the 1960s. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/marine-mammal-prote...
62.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Why did "Case study in Medicine" get stripped from the submitted title? It's way more clickbaity now.
63.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Putting a range map that covers from southern USA to north of the Arctic circle in Mercator projection is just negligent. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/data-visualisation-...
64.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Truthfulness is on totally different philosophical footing than consciousness, so the analogy doesn't hold up. There is no "hard problem of epistemology", but there is a hard problem of consciousness. There exist criteria for
65.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
I think the paper has what you are looking for. Several figures comparing performance to HRES, and "GraphCast... took roughly four weeks on 32 Cloud TPU v4 devices using batch parallelism. See supplementary materials section 4 for furt
66.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
If that's the cause, it's surprising that it's as bright as an entire city, for example nearby Lima.
67.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Slightly off-topic, but I wonder what the big circle of light pollution is in Western Brazil, west-southwest of Manaus? It looks like it's centered over Urucu, which Google reveals is home to a natural gas pipeline. I wonder if there w
68.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
"Totally wild" is probably an exaggeration, considering there is virtually nowhere in southern England that could reasonably be considered totally wild.
69.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Exactly. The only interesting thing here is that it managed to convince this person that "they built" anything. Also it seems there are tons of blogs about this exact task. I guess it's slightly interesting that there now exi
70.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
From the abstract of your link: > Regression results suggest no statistically distinguishable relationship between IQ scores and wealth Stop spreading dangerous myths.
71.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
> If only there was a clean fast bare-metal language to write all this in.. The author includes a footnotes for "BUT RUST.." and "BUT ZIG..", but how about Nim? Looks like there is a native library implementation of
72.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
This sounds great. How is the package management story, and how robust is the ecosystem currently?
73.
▲
by
shmageggy
3y ago
Holy shit, combined with the above that is infinity times better. Thanks.
74.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
> I am not sure I would consider decision trees and the like as 'AI' in any sense. These have always been considered AI, and I don’t see any reason that would change. E.g. https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/contents
75.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
There are certainly parallels. For one, the prompt involves the model simulating its own output, which clearly has a flavor of Universal Turing Machine to it. Then the token smuggling technique leans on the ability of the model to staticall
76.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
It's odd that Brooks describes "neuro-symbolic" as a "new term". It has been around for a couple of decades.
77.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
There are no antics. It's just to manage shifting the date without having a period with 15 months between bonuses. This is total non-news.
78.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
There is now jax.debug.print() and jax.debug.breakpoint(). It’s a start. https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/debugging/print_breakpo...
79.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
I’m not an expert in it either, but this problem is similar to both the N-queens problem and Sudoku, both of which can be solved via SAT, so tutorials for those should be a good start. Good luck!
80.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
This is really fun, and it definitely tickles that same part of the brain as sudoku. One UI suggestion is to use a diverging color palette for the larger numbers so there are different hues for too many versus too few attackers.
81.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
Looks like this could be translated into a SAT problem and solved with a SAT solver. Have you tried that?
82.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
Pure historical legacy. Today they are Open to all monetization avenues.
83.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
Someone is agreeing with you... on the internet.
84.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
> To me it’s weird because it’s so unimportant. Who cares which groups of who were advanced or not and what they were doing back then. The people colonizing those lands certainly cared at the time, and they used such beliefs to justify
85.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
I think this actually undersells the economic disparity between human and robotic exploration, particularly when extrapolated out to the next couple of decades. Yes, robots today are cheaper, more resilient, and more capable than us, but th
86.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
I’m glad lawmakers, investors, businesses, and nearly everyone else are not waiting around for “proof”, since that is a nearly impossible standard. We know that these substances are everywhere, and there is evidence of it causing harm in an
87.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
What will make people effectively poorer, not having non-stick coating on pans, or the large-scale poisoning of the natural world and our bodies?
88.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
Yeah I was kinda surprised how YOLO some of this was. For example > At some point I had to rewrite the Glicko2 rating system from Java to Scala 3 [...] No-one noticed broken ratings, so I suppose it worked. Sheesh. Seems like just the
89.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
While there are certainly many factors contributing to the growth of inequality, it is fairly well established that automation has contributed heavily. There has been a ton written about this so I won’t bother citing here, but googling “aut
90.
▲
by
shmageggy
4y ago
Delete your account. I did. I took stock of how much value it provided me, decided it was not much and declining, and not enough to offset supporting a billionaire megalomaniac large-scale boosting far right bullshit.
More ›