3 ms·
Truthfulness is on totally different philosophical footing than consciousness, so the analogy doesn't hold up. There is no "hard problem of epistemology", but t
by shmageggy 3y ago
Truthfulness is on totally different philosophical footing than consciousness, so the analogy doesn't hold up. There is no "hard problem of epistemology", but there is a hard problem of consciousness. There exist criteria for evaluating truthfulness (that we may reasonably disagree on) that can be applied to LLM output.
- joelfried 3y agoI think the Gettier problems are at least epistemological problems with some weight, at least as long as you're in the Justified True Belief sort of camp (which I think many of us start out as). If you haven't seen Gettier problems before, I'd start with the generalized problem and work out from there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem#The_generalized_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem#The_generalize...
- SamBam 3y agoI think the whole point of the philosophical concept of "bullshit" is that it's orthogonal to the truth. It doesn't matter whether the words end up being correct or not correct, it's still bullshit because the speaker doesn't know or care if it's actually true.