Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shlant
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
301.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
you seem to be very uncharitable to the author. Why would you assume some sort of maliciousness? Why is it that "he was clearly just asking "gotcha" questions to try and show the manager what a stupid question it was"? W
302.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> But in this case an obvious solution might be to do what your manager suggests simply because he is your manager. I hope more Autistic and non-Autistic people don't put up with this kind of argument. I'm sure most people have
303.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
1. that isn't the conclusion the author ends with. That quote is addressing example #4. The overall conclusion is under the header "Conclusion" 2. That quote also is not saying "everyone needs to change". It's
304.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> There is no attempt to see the other person's perspective, or evaluate how the author should be approaching the discussion The whole point of the article is to provide the perspective of the Autistic. Why are you assuming "Th
305.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
I don't understand why so many people are saying this. The article specifically says at the begging: "When these conflicts arise, here are some things that might be happening" SOME and MIGHT are being completely ignored and r
306.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
to be fair I am seeing very little empathy for the author in a lot of these comments
307.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
what is the point of dismissing someones Autism purely based on a single blog post and one person you knew? Are you actually trying to convey something helpful here?
308.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> expect the whole world to change their behaviour Who is saying this? The article provides a perspective that is not discussed very often as a way of helping people understand these situations from a vantage point they might not have co
309.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> I dont think I was being dismissive of anyone I think doubting someone is Autistic based on virtually no information would be considered pretty dismissive
310.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
I think you should probably do some more reading into Autism Spectrum Disorder. Your comment echos cliched and harmful ideas of what Autism is. The reason "Spectrum" is in the name is because there is a wide range of ways it can m
311.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
I think "allistic communication patterns" very effectively conveys what they are referring to ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
312.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
I think the point of the article is to express the ways in which it can feel like those on the spectrum are unwilling to admit they were wrong when it might not be what is happening by providing the perspective of the neurodivergent. I don&
313.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> Also, referring to "allistic communication patterns" might also be another impediment here. Normal people don't talk like that. It's like talking to a robot. why are you assuming they are talking to people IRL like
314.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
it seems weird that you would talk about supposed shortfalls of plant nutrition and then in the next sentence talk about cheeseburgers (who considers these healthy?) and multivitamins (which are not considered a substitute for proper nutrit
315.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
My apologies if I misunderstood. When you said "My problem with nuclear is the lack of a solution for waste" you meant "My problem with nuclear in the US is the lack of a currently implemented solution for waste"? And th
316.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> It's so much a solved problem that no country other than France has a permanent solution I think it's reasonable to acknowledge the difference between "we have a solution that has been implemented in the real world"
317.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> My problem with nuclear is the lack of a solution for waste Waste management is pretty much a solved problem [1][2] > Some pose catastrophic risks to the communities they are stored in "catastrophic" would have to be quali
318.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
> And they will never publicly (on TV, PBS, etc.) say that. Never - since initially they say it will STOP transmission (not reduce). care to provide evidence of significant figures saying this?
319.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
what a rollercoaster of a story. Thank you for sharing.
320.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
in the US at least, corn, rice, wheat and soy are subsidized by the government so the normal market forces you are describe don't apply in the same way
321.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
IMO the whole article reads like a guy who is overly concerned about his and everyone else's T levels..
322.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
yea the "well I can do it so you can to" approach is pretty weak. I'm not sure how good faith the original comment is being anyways, but I don't think this response is very effective regardless. It should at least be cav
323.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
is someone trying to take away your car or is this some sort of New Green Deal fearmongering? Or do you actually feel personally attacked just by people suggesting you give up your car?
324.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
what "bad actors" are you referring to? what are their "bad intents"?
325.
▲
by
shlant
4y ago
relevant article: https://dutchreview.com/culture/cycling/5-reasons-why-the-du...
326.
▲
by
shlant
5y ago
so you have no evidence. How much influence do you think what you are mentioning has had on the numbers and what is your proof of that?
327.
▲
by
shlant
5y ago
and? do you have any proof of your claim that "It incentivized people to list the cause of death as COVID even when covid didn't play a role in the death or was at best incidental to it"? Are you saying doctors are personally
328.
▲
by
shlant
5y ago
> the government was reimbursing hospitals for COVID treatment That's how all of medicare works. I can't believe people have been regurgitating this talking point since the beginning of the pandemic with no thought whatsoever a
329.
▲
by
shlant
5y ago
> This Nordic cross-comparison is lazy and agenda-driven. Nothing says "agenda-driven" like claiming that an incredibly complex comparison should be entirely based on "population-weighted density" and posting a blog t
330.
▲
by
shlant
5y ago
"If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell’s equations — then so much the worse for Maxwell’s equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation — well, these experimenta
More ›