shkkmo

50 ms·

841.
by shkkmo 3y ago
You're making huge assumptions there. Specifically that LLMs are only trained by megacorps (not currently true) or that copyright is only held by individuals (also not currently true.) Besides those mistaken assumptions, I think you ha
842.
by shkkmo 3y ago
Once you start predicting what someone is going to say you are no longer translating their speech
843.
by shkkmo 3y ago
An MP3 or any similar format, is a piece of data that exists to create an audio reproduction of a specific work. This single and clearly intentional purpose is quite different than the quite varied purpose of a trained generalist ML model.
844.
by shkkmo 3y ago
You seem to be conflating two things. Is the model itself a reproduction or is it capable or making reproductions? I think there is a strong argument for bot treating a ML model that is a mathematical amalgamation of a huge variety of mater
845.
by shkkmo 3y ago
That caveat is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with a private repository. When code is public, especially with a GPL license, it can end up in multiple repositories which may not all de-check the share check.
846.
by shkkmo 3y ago
I tried, all I could find was one other HN comment asking about it. Admittedly I could have tried harder but it really isn't my assertion to defend. I think there might be some confusion here between private repositories and public rep
847.
by shkkmo 3y ago
That is an examples of GitHub allegedly violating the license of public repositories. The claim that was made was that GitHub trained using private repositories and I have yet to see any evidence.
848.
by shkkmo 3y ago
If you your going to make these kinds of accusations (the kind that if proved true would lead to multi-million dollar lawsuits), you should at least try to provide sources.
849.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> If you use GitHub, you feed OpenAI with your code as training data already, with GitLab you do the same for Google. Do you have some evidence that github trained copilot on private repositories? They've been pretty clear about cla
850.
by shkkmo 3y ago
There are many point where that right ends. One is when you knowingly become a broker that sits between the two parties.
851.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Apart from supporting human trafficking (a non-negligible amount of sex workers has been brought from other countries under false pretenses and is held against their will) Isn't this primarily an argument for legalizing and regula
852.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> They are registered as a 501(c)(3) which is what people commonly call a public charity. TIL "public charity" is specific legal term that only some 501(c)(3) qualify as. To do so there are additional restrictions, including ar
853.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> He is basically openly poaching the employees of a company that he supposedly has a very close cooperation with Not doing that would be participating in illegal wage suppression. I'm not sure how following the law means OpenAI and
854.
by shkkmo 3y ago
I don't think "agitprop" is at all a fair comparison. It might be considered troll bait, but personally I view it as pointed quasi-satire. Corporations do tend to be authority based top down structures. There is a tendency to
855.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> I don't really understand Altman's compensation. I'm not sure I would WANT to work under a CEO that has literally ZERO stake in the company. This is a non-profit not a company. The board values the mission over the stock
856.
by shkkmo 3y ago
You can watch it directly on spacex without logging in to X
857.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> My original comment was framed to indicate the interest was hyper efficient at scale deployment in specific environments No, it wasn't. If that was your intent, you should go reread it to see why everyone else sees you making a cl
858.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> As I mentioned in a peer comment I'm more interested in tropical | equatorial performance Perhaps you should qualify your statements, because this: > Currently panels drop to 80% efficacy after 10 years and are doorstops in 20
859.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Polycrystalline panels last 20 years, sometimes longer (the sales pitch is "up to 25 years") but the 20% fal Your numbers seem off by atleast a facotor of 2. Average degradation is .5% per year so panels are guarantees are us
860.
by shkkmo 3y ago
You realize that submarine was only meant to last 20 years and instead they spent 3 years rebuilding it to serve a different role? It is also closer to 40 years than 50 and is decades younger than the rockets in question. I'd also haza
861.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> The list of things you can do is short.. Telecom, Telescopes looking down, tourism, space mining The first three have provided quite a bit of launch demand. Nation funded human space flight has been in decline since Apollo but commerci
862.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> I’ve never heard of this, and the only sources I can find for the claim you made about mother Teresa make claims that the organization that mother Teresa started would refuse patients pain medication out of misguided notions. I’m curio
863.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Today, the gap between scholars and the public is probably much narrower. I would argue the opposite. Each field of study has so much more depth now that on any given topic there is more that a layperson has to learn to be on par. Lay
864.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> He clearly seems to be pointing to a few people who produce novel ideas and creations as opposed to the mass of people who never create much of value globally out of their lives. The reason why it is clear that this is not what he is d
865.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Let's say I started making computers (somehow). I sell 10 the first year, 10 the next year, but I make to the front page of HN one day and I sell 1000 computers that year. Homeschooling has been around a long time. A sudden and ra
866.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> You're saying it sees someone as if AI is walking around and this all happened by random chance. It's called a thought experiment. You are claiming that processing imagery that is publicly available for viewing consitutes an
867.
by shkkmo 3y ago
So you have a general AI, it sees someone wearing a t-shirt containing a licensed, copyrighted image. This AI now needs to pay the copyright holder of that image? How I think it should work is the sa.e for any other intelligent system. Syst
868.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> If the model didn't learn anything important from Picasso, it wouldn't be in the training data. > This whole argument of "ah but it doesnt really need it" doesn't hold up. If the model didn't need it, i
869.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Because a Diffusion model can. This isn't a given, it is something that has yet to be decided in this case. (Edit: if you look at studies that look for examples of SD reproductions, the best examples still similar to what a human
870.
by shkkmo 3y ago
I would grant that as an example of blocking open software, but since Destiny 2 can be run on windows on a steam deck, it doesn't seem to be an example of blocking open hardware (not that steam deck hardware is actually 'open&#x27

More ›