shkkmo

52 ms·

781.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Do you remember when they Hollyweird degenerates sued a Christian company that wanted to put our G-rated versions of the movies aimed at children? The Christian company never suggested they not pay for the movies. No matter what the Ch
782.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> actual humans have to look at each case, and that's expensive and time consuming and O(n*m) on n new works that have to be compared against m existing in-copyright works for infringement. That scale already exists. The amount of c
783.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Pretty sure it was never like that, it was always gated by iTunes. Then you need to recalibrate your certainty assessment. Not only did I do this personally with both music and videos, it is incredibly easy to find documentation of the
784.
by shkkmo 3y ago
This is full of so many inaccuracies. > Copyright is a fairly ancient concept The idea is fairly old, but it's current implementation in law is not nearly that old. > that benefits normal people as much as it benefits big corpora
785.
by shkkmo 3y ago
It seems like this article makes a basic copyright mistake. I don't see any evidence that these are " reproductions" of source material like since no source image is linked to compare. Instead, these are derivative works. We
786.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Apple didn’t just copy all the music onto iPods and sell it — it took them a decade of deal making and lots of money to acquire the rights to the content I recaly iPod being a hard drive that I could connect to a computer and just copy
787.
by shkkmo 3y ago
Seems like an accurate interpretation to me given that article 4 includes: > The exception or limitation provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply on condition that the use of works and other subject matter referred to in that paragraph ha
788.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> It is not a label, it is scientifically established and accurate name Not all all. To someone who only understands the meanings of the individual words, the term is extremely ambigous. "Natural gas" could simply mean "ai
789.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> These statements are inherently ignoring the externalities that the dangers pose to others on the roads and streets. No, they don't. We don't ban alcohol or cars because of drunk drivers. We don't even require a breathly
790.
by shkkmo 3y ago
That is only a level 2 autonomous driving system, with capabilities on par with many other stock manufacturer driver assistance system. Having an open source alternative is coolsl, but it doesn't really bear on the argument I think is
791.
by shkkmo 3y ago
While the name was not coined as a form of greenwashing, the industry has a long history of greenwashing and outright lies. It is naive to think this industry hasn't considered what label to use for this product and how that affects pu
792.
by shkkmo 3y ago
You seem to be shifting the topic of this thread. The GP comment is about paraphrasing news articles while I don't see anything in the NYT lawsuit about paraphrasing. Rather, the NYT is concerned with exact reproduction or near exact r
793.
by shkkmo 3y ago
The Stanford link is just generic information about the fair use tests and does nothing to backup the assertion. > They aren't, in addition to facts they offer analysis, editorial positions, and so on. Those opinions and ideas are a
794.
by shkkmo 3y ago
If you think that the emphasis of the name "natural gas" over other just "gas" or other common terms for it isn't intentional, then you are quite naive. Education does not change how these sorts of tricks affect our
795.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> This means that if you apply and never hear back from a job, that’s not ghosting, a conversation never started. It only becomes ghosting when there is an expected next step that never happens. The article is specifically talking about
796.
by shkkmo 3y ago
The origin of the term doesn't mean that the term isn't an effective form of greenwashing that creates false perceptions around its harmful effects.
797.
by shkkmo 3y ago
Weird Al makes a point of getting permission even though he views his satirical works as fair use. The "commercial" test is only a part if the criteria and not necessary, but to say it has little impact is clearly false.
798.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Questions of fair use are famously gray, and anyone who declares something as "entirely fair use", with no caveats, is nearly always wrong except for the must obvious cases, which the given example is most definitely not. A j
799.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Teaching" by copying source books word for word, would be copyright infringement; see, for example, the well-known issues around photocopying books or even excerpts. Incorrect. Educational use helps satisfy one of tests for fair u
800.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> What still remains unclear, however, is how movement in a hyperbolic world impacts game play in a meaningful way. It impacts how far you have to go to reach a variety of terrain. In euclidean space there is a fixed amount of surface ar
801.
by shkkmo 3y ago
I would note that in the examples the NYT cites, the prompts explicitly ask for the reproduction of content. I think it makes sense to hold model makers responsible when their tools make infringement too easy to do or possible to do acciden
802.
by shkkmo 3y ago
The law on this does not currently exist. It is in the process of being created by the courts and legistatures. I personally think that giving copyright holders control over who is legally allowed to view a work that has been made publicly
803.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> However we have the existence proof of thousands of such allegations proven to be false [1] That's nothing like what is alleged here. A mentally ill mother pressuring a son into giving false testimony is very different from an adu
804.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> Tailgating is, in part, a symptom of inadequate capacity. You are advocating a solution that exacerbates it by reducing carrying capacity. Why are we still debating something that has been answered by science? Stop assuming your intuit
805.
by shkkmo 3y ago
Things are far less clear cut than you make them out. Yes, there is good science that shows that eyewitness testimony can be unreliable. There is also some okay science that shows that people can be prompted to create false memories. Howeve
806.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> We don't have the road capacity for everyone to drive that way. So we make tradeoffs. Part of that tradeoff means anticipating what other drivers will do and adjusting accordingly. Naturally, this will trade some safety for other
807.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> There is no single definition of tailgaiting other than being able to not being able to stop at a reasonable distance. So it is impossible to declare what constitutes tailing, especially in the mixed case of human drivers and robot dri
808.
by shkkmo 3y ago
Huh? Waymo is doing a level 4 rollout to specific areas where they are confident they can operate them safely. This study shows they are doing a good job with that. People in these markets get access to safer transportation once they can sc
809.
by shkkmo 3y ago
> I now have to overcompensate on average to maintain the same level of safety. Tailgating is bad, regardless of if people brake check or not. If automous vehicles are what it takes to get you to stop tailgating and follow at a safe dist
810.
by shkkmo 3y ago
The key part of it being "snake oil" is selling the system before it actually works. It has nothing to do with the approach to solving the problem.

More ›