shinpr

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by shinpr 10mo ago

   It’s not OS-level sandboxing or containers. Each sub-agent is executed as a separate CLI invocation (e.g. Cursor CLI or Claude Code), which means it gets a fresh model context window. The isolation is purely at the LLM context level, not pr
2. 2.▲
   by shinpr 10mo ago

   Author here. I kept hitting a failure mode common to LLM-based IDEs: the agent takes the shortest path to "done," skipping steps experienced engineers rely on — checking for similar code, following conventions, writing tests, doin
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: Sub-agents for Cursor via MCP (isolated context, no worktrees)(github.com)

   1 points by shinpr 10mo ago|3 comments
4. 4.▲
   Show HN: Claude Code plugin that runs a semi-autonomous AI dev workflow(github.com)

   1 points by shinpr 1y ago|0 comments
5. 5.▲
   by shinpr 1y ago

   We built this because every AI coding session was chaotic. The model would forget my architecture decisions, delete tests when adding features, and basically act like a junior dev with amnesia. Agentic Code makes your AI follow the same ste
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Agentic Code – Make AI coding tools follow real workflows(github.com)

   1 points by shinpr 1y ago|1 comments
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: TypeScript boilerplate for scaling Claude Code beyond context limits(github.com)

   2 points by shinpr 1y ago|0 comments