shieVae4I

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by shieVae4I 5y ago

   I suppose I was implicitly assuming "in an economic manner". You're very right that humans do things that narrow, economic game theory can't account for (e.g. the RAND secretaries playing Nash's "So Long Sucker
2. 2.▲
   by shieVae4I 5y ago

   Allow me to quote the Algorand paper, https://people.csail.mit.edu/nickolai/papers/gilad-algorand-... : > Weighted users.To prevent Sybil attacks, Algorand assigns a weight to each user. BA⋆is designed to guaran
3. 3.▲
   by shieVae4I 5y ago

   It's not a particularly interesting Byzantine mechanism. Like every other such mechanism (in the absence of trusted computing and similar tricks) it has a n = 3f+1 limit. See the selfish mining paper for why it's not n=2f+1. It&#x
4. 4.▲
   by shieVae4I 5y ago

   > Manufacturing, Music, Politics and now The final big boss, money. Isn't that a "they laughed at Galileo" argument? They thought the Internet was snake oil. They thought Napster was snake oil. They thought BitTorrent was
5. 5.▲
   by shieVae4I 5y ago

   > Side question, why do you write your years with a leading zero? I've never seen that before and it has quite a cognitive strain for me. That's likely a Long Now reference: https://blog.longnow.org/02013/1