Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shawnz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
421.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Value stocks give better returns because they are riskier, not because of the quality of OP's analysis into what companies are worth. And why do they ignore the fact that indexes can be diversified across countries? These counterargume
422.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
It seems to me like a "reactive intelligence" is basically equivalent to an "adaptive intelligence" which just hasn't begun making use of all of its possible outputs yet. Obviously even though we adapt to our enviro
423.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
That clearly doesn't explain how you get from the biological system to intelligence though. NNs can be imagined as a (highly simplistic) form of repeated experiment too.
424.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
> If you go out and actually study the only known systems which learn effectively (ie., animals), one does not find the need for universal approximator theorems in explaining their capacities. What's the explanation for their capaci
425.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Carbon nanotubes in fact have similar pathology to asbestos. I don't think that specific issue applies to graphene though.
426.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
It does mention app passwords on this page, but it's not clear that they are saying app passwords will continue to work after this change.
427.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
What about clients which don't support that, like Google's "send mail as" feature? I suppose that won't be supported anymore?
428.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Based on historical trends it seems more likely to me that $90 computers of the future will simply be able to run the most advanced consumer software locally and thin clients will just be unnecessary complexity.
429.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
GPT-3 actually does track the previous 2048 tokens of input and output for context.
430.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Windows now exposes the multiple desktops feature in the shell.
431.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Right, I mean to say why would potential contributors want to afford those benefits to the original author so that only the original author can monetize it?
432.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
I don't think it's a matter of maintaining the purity of the meaning, it's about maintaining the intent. The point of FOSS isn't to let people benefit up to the point where they start being able to outcompete you, the po
433.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
I don't think those are really reasons for choosing an OSS license, they are reasons for choosing a source-available license (of which OSS licenses are just one kind). > I'm not denying AWS is adding value, but it sure is odd t
434.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Don't you think there's a moral issue expecting free contributions to something which only you are allowed to monetize? And how can you satisfy users to the greatest extent while also preventing them from using the provider that i
435.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
You sure? There have been a lot of misconceptions by laypeople about what is "safe for human consumption" through the years
436.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
You'd rather appoint regulators with no industry experience?
437.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Spam filtering?
438.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
They can in Android 12.
439.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
The steep part of a sigmoid curve DOES grow almost exponentially though. What's the point of saying this? It's like saying, "sure we are making great progress, but eventually the universe will come to an end and we'll al
440.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
I would argue that programming is one such application which makes math interesting. I'm not sure they are really seperate worlds of problem solving at all.
441.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Agreed, this was upsetting to read. Why is the author wasting their life in a field which they don't even see as a valid creative endeavor?
442.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
But those same proxies/firewalls probably won't understand QUERY either, right? And if they are updated to add support, why can't they be updated to add support for GET with request bodies?
443.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Supporting stone age system administration tools is basically Red Hat's core business though. That doesn't really seem like a fair comparison.
444.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
So it's merely equally as good as the previous market leader's flagship product in every way except litography, where it exceeds them? Are you implying that's not something to be impressed about just because lithography is no
445.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
If you make the interface between unprivileged client and privileged server too complicated, eventually it will be more complicated than the interface of executing a setuid binary and potentially more likely to have bugs
446.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Whatever eventually displaces JMeter has got to start somewhere.
447.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
But the "hack" is that they were never intended to be practical even if left in.
448.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
Aren't the seats themselves already a "hack"?
449.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
The argument you are making here is not that drugs should be legalized for consistency's sake . The argument you are making is that drugs should be legalized because the dangers of prohibition outweigh the benefits. That is a complete
450.
▲
by
shawnz
5y ago
If we assume that the great filter is ahead of us, then we were already a better lower bound. If it's behind us, then who cares?
More ›