3 ms·
The argument you are making here is not that drugs should be legalized for consistency's sake. The argument you are making is that drugs should be legalized bec
by shawnz 5y ago
The argument you are making here is not that drugs should be legalized for consistency's sake. The argument you are making is that drugs should be legalized because the dangers of prohibition outweigh the benefits. That is a completely different line of reasoning
- merpnderp 5y agoIf our threshold for badness is X and we apply that to alcohol, but don't apply that to drugs, then we're being inconsistent with how we apply our threshold for badness. You just had to take your argument a step further to see the consistency argument.