sharts

24 ms·

541.
by sharts 3y ago
Aren’t you doing the same by replying to their comment?
542.
by sharts 3y ago
The incentive already exists and that is to become a modern society. The poor countries will reach the same when they develop.
543.
by sharts 3y ago
Why does the fertility rate even matter? The world seems to have far more people than it can reliably sustain. If we reach 1/10th the size of the current population, then we can start to wonder about fertility rate if it drops further.
544.
by sharts 3y ago
Embedded devices?
545.
by sharts 3y ago
Typical corporate shenanigans. What company wouldn't do this ever? Probably none.
546.
by sharts 3y ago
Who cares what investors think?
547.
by sharts 3y ago
You’d think by now editor configs could be easily migrated/translated between products.
548.
by sharts 3y ago
Nobody will believe it and you will be subjected to a cavity search of your butt.
549.
by sharts 3y ago
Who says ex-googlers aren't the sharpest tools in the shed?
550.
by sharts 3y ago
What can one expect when the majority of people that are employed by a particular company share the same values? How can there be any innovation with group think and a small minority of decision makers insulated in their bubbles from the re
551.
by sharts 3y ago
The problem is that UI/UX people are product and design people whose backgrounds were predominantly in art or similar. 99% of these folks have no background psychology, human factors, information science or the cognitive sciences. Wha
552.
by sharts 3y ago
Another solution would be generational and family housing. Kind of amusing that the solutions to modern problems are quickly becoming what were once thought of primitive lifestyles and culture.
553.
by sharts 3y ago
What’s so different in modern times? Exploitative employers have taken their place via social mandate.
554.
by sharts 3y ago
What’s a 2020’s woman?
555.
by sharts 3y ago
I have been there as well. Happy to be single. When it gets lonely I think back to how it could be and then carry on.
556.
by sharts 3y ago
Crazy how much blank space both of these seem to waste on a wide screen.
557.
by sharts 3y ago
People hate on Google yet...continue to use their services and want to work there. Therefore, people do not disapprove.
558.
by sharts 3y ago
Indeed. It is the only rational and moral thing to do.
559.
by sharts 3y ago
It’s not Microsoft. It’s Microsoft employees. Someone decided to do make this happen. Why do MS/Google/FB employees just not care about anything other than compensation these days?
560.
by sharts 3y ago
"And so we are left with problems like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’s recent announcement that it can’t find enough skilled workers to get its new Arizona chip plants ready in time" Wasn't this shown to be false
561.
by sharts 3y ago
Don't cell providers across the country charge the same price regardless of coverage guarantees? Generally you'd probably negotiate w/ stakeholders BEFORE advertising. I'm not sure why any sane person would advertise som
562.
by sharts 3y ago
Yes. Those who support it will be paid handsomely by lobbyists. Why doesn't anybody stand up for those people's right to make money at public expense?
563.
by sharts 3y ago
I think Python has some of the worst API documentation I’ve ever read. Even Java puts it to shame and that is sad
564.
by sharts 3y ago
Python had been around much longer than that. But it was mostly in the realm of scientific things. Ruby became popular when Rails exploded and everyone got into Web 2.0. Lots of other frameworks came out after that and there was no other ki
565.
by sharts 3y ago
If A punches B, and then B punches A. And then we claim B is in the wrong for punching A. While we might be technically correct, we would also be disingenuous.
566.
by sharts 3y ago
This is obvious. So of course most people will never do it.
567.
by sharts 3y ago
Like social media ruined the world despite it's initial promises, like crypto ended up with grifters of all kinds, AI will follow. Yes, there are some narrow applications that will be GOOD. But will the good outweigh the bad? No, not a
568.
by sharts 3y ago
Couldn't they have just moved their python to Cython / Pyrex? Or changed their arch and kept the tech stack the same? I wonder how much time and team hours were spent learning the new framework and it's caveats vs if they&#x2
569.
by sharts 3y ago
I'd take noisy syntax over the noise that is Python API docs any day.
570.
by sharts 3y ago
Worker-owned anything can work. It's democracy in the workplace.

More ›