shakna

45 ms·

901.
by shakna 1y ago
Hardware is not excluded. Driver in-kernel are not excluded - ALL service packs are included. ALL modules are included. nVidia not being mentioned, means they're not excluded. nVidia certainly seem to think that their drivers are open
902.
by shakna 1y ago
Because its in scope for their support license that you're paying them for. nVidia is neither Java nor a web server. https://www.suse.com/support/policy-products/
903.
by shakna 1y ago
Ok... But if you want to ignore the last twenty years, you should probably pick another name, because it has been used a particular way for two decades. If you want "more choice" - use a name unbound by a tradition old enough to d
904.
by shakna 1y ago
I somehow doubt this will pass the snifftest of one of my old addresses, which Australia Post successfully delivered to on a weekly basis: Third on right of main, Tiwi College, Melville Island, 0822, AU. You can try to norm
905.
by shakna 1y ago
... Except you have already admitted that it has bupkus to do with C. You said it was a lack of "modern tooling". Modern C toolchains vastly outstrip most, for modernity. C23 is three years old. But no. I wont be breaking compatib
906.
by shakna 1y ago
The spec uses both UUID and GUID. You can expect the same thing for both. > This specification defines UUIDs (Universally Unique IDentifiers) -- also known as GUIDs (Globally Unique IDentifiers) -- and a Uniform Resource Name namespace f
907.
by shakna 1y ago
No, its defined to a series of specifications. [0] Ones that define an underlying structure, in bits. You have a 16byte random string. Thats great. But it is not a UUID. [0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9562.html
908.
by shakna 1y ago
Ok... So you're not saying C is a problem. You're saying every few years, we should torch our code and rewrite from scratch, using new tools. ... Enjoy your collapsing codebase. I'll stick with what works, thanks.
909.
by shakna 1y ago
On the other hand, I have heard of Berry, but never Jerry. I thought Espruino was the more common JS for microcontrollers? https://www.espruino.com/
910.
by shakna 1y ago
But this doesn't generate guid/uuids? It generates random bytes.
911.
by shakna 1y ago
That is fine. That's not what has been complained about here. That's invitational, not wall of jargon.
912.
by shakna 1y ago
Python's pathlib wouldn't help you here, it can encode the necessary bits. Especially with configparser - it's 20 year old configuration reader. Java's story is worse. What part of this would be prevented by another lang
913.
by shakna 1y ago
Maybe so, if that is your choice, but it is not giving "people the opportunity to clarify what they want to ask".
914.
by shakna 1y ago
Well, when you get scandals like Facebook trying to get patient data [0], Cambridge Analytica [1], TikTok spying on reporters [2], and so very many more [3], it is rather hard to see incompetence over malice. I absolutely believe that there
915.
by shakna 1y ago
Re-identifying data is really, really easy. Anonymised data is largely... Not anonymous for long. [0] The leading research has been saying that for decades. And whilst you say there's so much protection... We have countless examples of
916.
by shakna 1y ago
The problem there, is seeing the underlying theme. People wanted less of the same. They didn't want big groups controlling the vast amount of the art that they were exposed to. Throwing away copyright, might allow more competition in t
917.
by shakna 1y ago
> What's wrong with asking their level of experience with the topic? Nothing. That's precisely the point. Giving a wall of jargon, isn't asking if someone is familiar.
918.
by shakna 1y ago
It really doesn't. a) GDPR has an exemption for court orders. Which this is. (All court orders are legitimate reason). b) GDPR says you can't log private data. Which they were. (You can only log legitimate interests, contractual o
919.
by shakna 1y ago
Article 6 does not differentiate between civil and criminal. > Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies: > ... > processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried o
920.
by shakna 1y ago
"Logs" is what is in the order. If OpenAI have already been violating your rights, by putting private information into the logs, then your beef is with them, not the courts for preserving data. > Accordingly, OpenAI is NOW DI
921.
by shakna 1y ago
It seems like an obvious take here. They were asked to preserve their logs, to prevent them from deleting incriminating information. Which is... Par for the course. But OpenAI are desperately trying to spin it that the logs should not be al
922.
by shakna 1y ago
I think the negotiation signal being sent by "all jargon" is "fuck off". It's not an attempt to gauge what level the other person is using. It's a blank wall, being thrust towards them.
923.
by shakna 1y ago
Delta Chat can already run on top of iroh [0]. No need to find some other server implementation - it can already do "truly" P2P - devices can end up running their own STUN and TURN servers, etc. [0] https://delta.chat&#
924.
by shakna 1y ago
Until it dissolves forty years down the line, like many do.
925.
by shakna 1y ago
You don't have to logically concede a proposition is fine. You can still point to an outcome being an unknown. There's a reason we have the idiom, "better the devil you know".
926.
by shakna 1y ago
If you include the user clicking, then it already is. [0] [0] https://github.com/brandondong/css-turing-machine
927.
by shakna 1y ago
I've seen many rings in stomachs and throats, in the emergency room...
928.
by shakna 1y ago
No, it really was France, I'm afraid. https://terrypratchett.com/explore-discworld/the-modernisati...
929.
by shakna 1y ago
That's the point of the "or". You probably don't know which you're getting. It's what makes that particular design decision bite you more often.
930.
by shakna 1y ago
Salesforce is a rather popular platform. Its defaults are also either a 18-character ID, or a 32bit integer. So, unless you take the effort to actually fight Apex, you're gonna hit this problem sooner or later.

More ›