4 ms·
"Logs" is what is in the order. If OpenAI have already been violating your rights, by putting private information into the logs, then your beef is with them, n
by shakna 1y ago
"Logs" is what is in the order.
If OpenAI have already been violating your rights, by putting private information into the logs, then your beef is with them, not the courts for preserving data.
> Accordingly, OpenAI is NOW DIRECTED to preserve and segregate all output log data that would otherwise be deleted on a going forward basis until further order of the Court (in essence, the output log data that OpenAI has been destroying), whether such data might be deleted at a user’s request or because of “numerous privacy laws and regulations” that might require OpenAI to do so.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.640396/gov.uscourts.nysd.640396.551.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.64...
- senko 1y ago> that would otherwise be deleted This is important. OpenAI was already deleting the data (as per their policies), now they can't. As an insult to injury, the paragraph you quoted also gives a fat middle finger to GDPR.
- shakna 1y agoIt really doesn't. a) GDPR has an exemption for court orders. Which this is. (All court orders are legitimate reason). b) GDPR says you can't log private data. Which they were. (You can only log legitimate interests, contractual obligations, legal compliance, or consent.) Again - this is logs, this is not your average user data. This is not their database. This is not the historical chats of their users. This is just... The... Access... Logs.