shakiljiwa

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   I’ve edited it to be a framework to assess smoothness and approached it more rigorously (humbly as I’m still young) and clearly.
2. 2.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   Thank you for your constructive feedback, what you’re saying about v is correct but only for a single observer, since information already exists and can only be realized. From this, naturally, dv/dt is intuitively how much we think we
3. 3.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   Thank you for the suggestion, I have sent it around to some people like that to see their take! Waiting to hear more.
4. 4.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   Thank you for the input, I’m an engineer and phd student in engineering so I based a lot of this on intuition, there’s an order gap for me to write something traditionally axiomatic and rigorous, but my understanding is that algebra is base
5. 5.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   Can you give me any hint as to why? See my other comment for the pdf if u didn’t see that.
6. 6.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   Please let me know any way you think this is wrong.. a couple people agree but I don’t know who can tell me how correct it is.
7. 7.▲
   by shakiljiwa 2y ago

   https://github.com/sfj3/Navier-Stokes-Smoothness/blob/main/o...
8. 8.▲
   I may have solved smoothness in the navier stokes equation

   1 points by shakiljiwa 2y ago|12 comments